Do you think people need to be specified that we're not talking about a coin with less than 3% of a BTC in value BSV+BCH+BGD ect when talking about just Bitcoin? My blog posits that for all of them, they

Bitcoin is the Phoenix Martin Armstrong and Rothschild controlled Economist Magazine both predicted (in 1985 and 1988 respectively) the arrival of the Phoenix by 2018. Legacy Bitcoin is the Phoenix and

Your illogical ranting never addresses the core arguments and insights such as Satoshi’s intentional key design tradeoffs of Bitcoin and why those give legacy, immutable Bitcoin the unforgable costliness

I’ll presume that’s just humor and not any serious conflation of QE with hyperinflation. They’re not at all the same. Hyperinflation only happens in totally failed States wherein the citizens have lost

Precisely Why Bitcoin Is Re-accelerating The sudden rises in the Bitcoin price are due to sudden increases in the proof-of-work difficulty level. In the past that was due to onboarding better mining

BTC is literally dead if this is ever to happen. Nope. Legacy Bitcoin will come alive and go to $2 million in 2020 because of “this”. Core Bitcoin will go to ~$0. Precisely Why Bitcoin Is Re-accelerating

You are conflating Shelby (aka @anonymint) with the economic majority. Those are two different entities. The economic majority decide. You somehow have fooled yourself into thinking I am writing about

Noncustodial, Decentralized Exchange I found an overview of assurances and threats for crypto/blockchain, but it’s incomplete. Returning my focus to one of the key issues of atomic cross-chain exchange

You are conflating facts and opinion. The economic majority is a well established fact due to the natural law of the power-law distribution of resources. Your (typical Westernized, Millennial self-important,

I posted a comment relevant to this blog on my subsequent blog Our Bitcoins Will Be Taken/Frozen By the Miners; Involuntary INCOME Tax on Frozen Bitcoin!: P.S. The winner of the BCTalk Ten Year Anniversary

Imagine that after the initiation of the posited SegWit donations on the legacy chain, pools will have difficulty paying out shares to miners, because again the block space opportunity cost will be too

Is there any way to wash the taint of segwit from existing legacy addresses? Typically running bitcoin through an exchange will originate from a bech address before handing you your "1..." intended

Sure, but that's completely ignorant of reality. Whose reality? Yours or the economic majority. The problem is as we have learned from our recent discussions, I would argue that you do not appear to have

Please read and re-read all my comments in this comment thread. I hope I have now clarified all the necessary points? Segwit was supported by 99% of miners signaling(bit 4) , at some point they wanted

You replied before I finished the post. My post had an instruction it saying I had to go out to meet an old friend and to please check back later for the final edits. Now I have made those final edits

I appreciate the probing questions so that hopefully we can get all these points written down concisely for future readers. Please re-read my post which you replied to, because I have clarified my points

Collapse of Western Civilization Underway Armstrong has two cycle charts for the break up of the U.S.A.: 224 Year Collapsing Wave Structure Points to Breakup of USA The USA is in its Death Throes The first

I can finally give you an upvote for conversing in a cordial tone while expressing your opinions. Thank you for taking the initiative to deescalate the tension. Not to brag but I am significantly

It’s not the Christian way to respond with such a tone and I’m not proud of it. My dilemma is these zombies come at me never ending waves, repeating the same myopic accusations which I had already replied

Even if SegWit after a hard-fork goes on for "ever", with P2PKH type addresses you will sit on every subsequent fork simply by holding legacy, anyways. But with involuntary income tax implications