Well... Here in Steemit I've found lots of posts supporting anarchy and actually very well-based. I've read some and found that people really believe in this "System" and i totally respect and tolerate that opinion, but I always think what it would be like.
First I want to highlight that I'm not a fan of state control, I totally valorate the autonomy of people as a fundamental aspect of construction of society. ¿But can we really live without an state? Hey, years have been passing and with modernity we could learn that when the state doesn't get involved in the matter of people, but at the same time state is neccesary for normality and estability.
These two are the main things when I say I'm against anarchy, and living in Venezuela has shown me a little bit what anarchy is!
*Normality: normal is what we are used to, right? Normality is then normal things happening in the time, normal for us is to have legal regulations, normal for us is not surpass the rights of others and also respect to mine, anarchy bases in a perfect society which is not plausible nowadays, when my rights are surpassed it's when anarchy doesn't work and in Venezuela (A society like most in the world, 'cause we have more ignorant people than cult ones) I've seen consequences of people that don't even matter a little bit about your rights or even respecting you which is kinda anarchist!
*Estability: in order to have functional society, it needs to be estable and today in Venezuela neither we have normality nor estability, if only Maduro weren't in the presidency, we would be a full anarchy and watching what anarchy causes, it cannot be a form of life anywhere!
So not having these two aspects means not having life quality and the worst thing is that life quality isn't going to be in your hands, it going to be in others hands also. The question is then: I would prefer my personal liberty to be in many hands or barely depend in one hand?
