Here we are constellated to discuss love. Yes “LOVE”.
This reminds me of a friend and admirer of my blogs surprised how I would build a speech on LOVE.
Now I come to the main point, YES, ‘LOVE’!
I am afraid that now “love” is supposed to be the lodestone between two antipodal sex. I hope you would agree with me.
Ladies and gentlemen ‘LOVE’ is the most talk about term since the time honorary since the coinage of mankind (ADAM).it subsisted since then, preferably I must say even before, when there was nothing but a begetter, even the innovation of the cosmos is because of LOVE. Love of the begetter of the creation.
In the contemporary age there is also lot of talking about love, but I am scared that now love is basically assumed to precipitate in sex and not beyond, in as much as there are couple who may not even love each other but still they are nuptial and aggrandizing population.
Hmm, I am seeing smiles on faces, maybe there is epithet in others but what I am saying is a beaming fact, and everyday proficiency.
My alter ego, thinking of LOVE with such a low demerit is not justified. If I am asked to delineate love I would say IMMOLATION, SELFLESSNESS, NOT DEMANDING, TO SUBMIT TO THE WILL OF THE BELOVED. This is the phase which abides by the instincts of mankind as esteem to physical as well a spiritual. A mother is the most immolating person foe her children.it may be said that it is in her instinct to love her children. Let’s take true ‘friendship’, there is no coercion, but sometimes friends do immolate for each other. There are people who love their fellow being without any blood affinity. God creates the blood commerce, but to us the commerce we make are important. This is the aspect of love. It elongates when it is underpinned on selflessness otherwise parting is there _”SOMEONE LOVED WOULD LEAVE YOU BEHIND WITHOUT LOVE”.
