SP8DE THE CHANCE PLAY. CHANGED

Sp8de-THE-GAME-OF-CHANCE.-CHANGED-1024x255.png
SP8DE is here to change the way people think about Game of Chance
Just as Bitcoin has changed the way people think about money.

Game of Chance is a risk-taking game; The point is the risks ... and, of course, the reward. It's all said, however. Per se, they are just abstract concepts and lack of mathematical substance. They are just artifacts of ancient man-made games built around a concept that is at least as old as the universe itself. This concept is commonly referred to as Chaos or randomness: the lack of a pattern or combination that can be understood.

It still sounds abstract. So when applied to the game, randomness is a core concept: it is a process that may not be manipulated by anyone and regularly delivers an unnumbered set of numbers that determine who wins and who loses. This is basically a really refreshing number. The process of generating these numbers is not possible:
a. Manipulated by any evil party,
b. Recognized with a significant probability given the input of the information available before scrolling, or
c. Observed by anyone before anyone else does ... at least in theory,
d. Also, of course, it has to be repeated.

The canonical example of manmade mechanism which, if made fairly, is sufficient to meet this important quality is the roulette wheel that is routinely used in almost all casinos worldwide. Thus, roulette wheel screening through our 4 prerequisites for a random number generating mechanism that can be applied to a casino:
a. This wheel produces self-refreshing (meaning recursively generating new numbers - from time to time) a collection of numbers - the number and color of the winning pockets for several periods,
b. Manipulating rolling wheel results is not possible assuming a good wheel,
c. Many individuals who tend to be mathematical about the history of mankind develop and use complex methods aimed at 'guessing' (more like 'predicting the outcome of certain games with statistically significant and, more importantly, interesting economic probabilities') the results of various casino games including roulette) is given a set of inputs: little if any ever works;
d. Of course, this is repeatable: each wheel rotation by the dealer is a new iteration that generates a series of randomly selected values.

So now let's take a closer look at each of the above points: 'a.' and D.' satisfied with the definition - no formal proof is needed - indeed, the roulette wheel intent is to generate a random collection of values and these values are refreshed on each round. 'C' is justified more on empirical reasons: many have tried to solve the bets without risk, captivated by the endless wealth of mirages associated with casinos as well as the complexities and wide interdisciplinary application of mathematics involved in modeling. various aspects of gambling. The most successful of all 'magic models' is probably a betting system, like, for example, the famous Martingale system. If someone is betting carefully and has a risk management strategy that is well respected and adhered to regardless of circumstances,

On average, of course, the house always wins and there is no kind of magic or elegant mathematical model strong enough to test the time in the casino hall. Instead, there is only a smart money management system that represents a redesigned model primarily from the areas of accounting and financial risk management. The above is quite appropriate when used to describe the roulette, but not limited to this game. The rest 'b.' the dots look fairly ordinary and on the first reading it seems not too different from the other three. However, there is a fundamental difference between the two:

a. There is little meaning in the sentence itself: without a long clarification it seems to claim that using a fair wheel requires it well ... to have a good wheel. But what is fair in the end?

b. This point is the only one that implies that one needs to assume something.

So, not just the concept of 'fair wheel' is very abstract and in this form has little value applied. On top of this, you really have to assume that you have it: there are not much better ways to satisfy the final point to arrive at a 'good' random number generating process that can be used in a casino.
So what's the problem with this? Why is this one different from the others? What roulette wheel should be adapted to the definition of 'fair wheel' and what is this definition? Here are some of the issues we will discuss in the "SP8DE: contemporary casino design - from the early days of mankind to the era of rebellion". We will also show how the 'fair-wheel' issue becomes one of the main unsolved issues in the online gambling industry and how it is solved in half. This will prepare ground for the introduction of modular blockchain technology into discussions. Finally, we will begin to describe how the seemingly simple concept used in the casino world can provide a useful and highly efficient framework for analyzing many real-world gambling problems-unrelated eg in the political sphere.