Catastrophic Crashes

Since the weight in Ambr is determined by the assets owned by the voters. Assume that the percentage of votes required for a stable point pass is k %, that is, the proportion of the assets owned by the vote in the total assets is greater than k % to form a stable point. In this way, another attack method can be derived. As long as the attacker attacks nodes with more assets, these nodes cannot respond, and the assets owned by these nodes are greater than 1-k %. After the attack is successful, the vote will never pass, i.e., the stability point will not be generated again. At this time, the system will detect the reason why the vote cannot be passed. If the network cannot reach consensus, follow the above steps. If the vote fails, the response strategy is as follows:

1. The system first detects unresponsive nodes in a set, and the nodes in the set are sorted according to the proportion of owned assets and total assets.

2. The system will set a delay time T. If the current time t > T, the system relocates the assets from the nodes (according to the order of the nodes in the collection) to the voting asset until the required asset.

3. The system checks the nodes in the collection. If the investigation result suggests no network attack, the verifier is not responding to its own reason, and the verifier will be subject to a penalty of taking out the corresponding percentage of the assets. If the investigation results in an attacker launching a cyber-attack, all of the attacker’s deposits will be confiscated.