I put out a poll on Substack (not knowing that only People on Substack could respond) on May 26, 2025, asking if these things are okay to do to the One answering:
You can see the poll here, though it is closed now: https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/poll-are-any-of-these-things-okay
I had stated that I thought no One would answer “Yes” when I put it up. And… Two People answered “Yes.” The first to answer “Yes” explained:
Im the only masochist who answered yes! And its not even to make fun. I accept the first law if its from a flesh elderly of mine who without me knowing of course, would come and hurt me to teach me something, can be martial training, or to be always on guard, or just a good ol spank if i had bad behaved.
I accept the second term because material as no value, it will be sad for me, but its even sadder for who does it. And if we cant make mistake, where is the learning process and the need for redemption? Also, every material is a boulder to carry, if they liberate me im free.
And i also accept the third term, if i got defraud, i wasnt wise enough to protect myself from it. Than when it will have fallen unto me, i can surely teach to others how to protect from it. So its another learning process needed to be vigilant. Plus who knows! Maybe ill find a solution to that fraud later and be the cure to that virus. Can make a living of this.
What I explained was that, by answering “Yes,” One is consenting, and leaving the question unanswered. And frankly, I disagree that it’s okay to hurt flesh to “teach” unless the One being taught knows that there may be pain in the lessons and…consents.
And being spanked is not the best way to teach that some behavior is wrong. I never once spanked My daughter. But I did, like My father did to Me, set Her down and discussed the wrong behavior – at length. That worked like a charm. As it worked on Me when Dad did it.
Accepting that Others can steal and sabotage One’s stuff surely is consenting to it. But that does not make the behavior Ethical.
And whether One is “wise enough” is not the point. This answer suggests that it’s okay, that this One consents to all the lies and hell the moneyed psychopaths have filled the world with. Never mind They indoctrinate into Us that viruses and contagion are real, that sunlight is cancer-causing, and so many other lies Most think are true that this would be nigh an encyclopedia if I listed them all.
All in all, this One did not answer the question, so We can discard this “Yes.”
The second “Yes” was from One who offered:
I honestly chose to click the least sensible poll answer
So, not an honest answer in the least.
Ergo, though the poll suggests 3% answered “Yes,” in truth, discarding those two non-applicable answers, 100% said “No.” As I predicted.
These behaviors listed as proscribed in the Laws are universally unacceptable. No One thinks they’re okay to be done to Themselves. And frankly, I can think of nothing that is not on this list that no One would say was okay – all else is a matter of taste. If You can think of something that does not fit in with these three proscriptions, that no One would say was okay to be done to Themselves, do let Me know.
I have asked so many times of so many People for something not on the list that no One would say was okay… That at this point, in the decades of asking, I can give a probability approaching 100% that there is nothing.
And so, I think these Laws are perfect for society to be run by.
And surely the ghastly and psychopathic legal(/governmental) system does unEthical things all the time. Making Ethical things illegal, and unEthical things legal – all for the legalate (not Law) makers’ profit.
We can co-create so much better...
Calling a Legalate a Law (article): @amaterasusolar/calling-a-legalate-a-law
Money Motivates the Most Marvelous Manifestations! (article): @amaterasusolar/money-motivates-the-most-marvelous-manifestations
Self-Defense and Ethics – How Does That Work? (article): @amaterasusolar/self-defense-and-ethics-how-does-that-work
Money Has Bought This Poisonous World (article): @amaterasusolar/money-has-bought-this-poisonous-world
Ethical Anarchy (article): @amaterasusolar/ethical-anarchy
Beneath the Beasts! (article): @amaterasusolar/beneath-the-beasts
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.
