Let Us say Your neighbors planted a tree in Their yard. You think it’s uglier than sin and want it gone. So…
You draw a picture of You (but it’s a stick figure) chopping down the tree (also stickish) and go place that on the porch to tell Them You will be cutting it down.
You see the neighbor pick up the drawing and look at it, shrug and toss it onto a chair there on the porch as They go off to work. You say to Yourself, “AHA! They are giving consent!” You pull out Your chainsaw, march over there, and cut the damned thing down.
I am guessing You, the reader, would not think that is a valid taking of implied consent.
Another example I have in My article, I Do Not Consent (linked below), is as follows:
It would be like wanting to hit someOne, taking a pen and some sticky notes to the bathroom, writing down that You are going to hit the One You want to hit, peeling the sheet off, sticking it to the underside of the sink, and then going to that One and delivering a punch.
You then say, “You didn’t say You don’t consent to Me hitting You so You agreed that it was okay for Me to do so.”
The moneyed psychopaths think that by “telling” Us things in fashions such as these, that We are giving Our consent when We don’t say, “No!” But surely this is not Ethical. To be Ethical, We must be given all pertinent information, free of wile and distraction, in the vernacular We speak, in clear and certain terms.
Their legal system is full of obscurities that We seldom have time to find, let alone grasp the “legal” meaning of. Yet They think “ignorance of the law (legalate) is no excuse.” Never mind that the number of legalates “on the books” in so many, no One knows the number. Yet They expect Us to know them all! They are surely beneath the beasts!
They do “predictive programming,” creating movies, TV shows, web productions, writing books, and such, veiled as “fiction,” and when We do not express Our lack of consent, They say We consented to Their plans. This is why so many things that are happening seem to be fiction “coming true.”
And so, I make a point, when I see anything offered that looks ghastly or otherwise is not what I want, to say, “I do not consent to that.” Or “I do not consent to [whatever is being presented].” This way, whether it’s truly fiction or not, My stance cannot be construed as consent in any way. You might want to pick up this practice, too…
I do not consent to war.
I do not consent to psychological operations (like Sandy Hook and Charlie Kirk).
I do not consent to the poisoning of My food.
I do not consent to toxins added to My water.
I do not consent to spraying My skies.
I do not consent to planned obsolescence.
I do not consent to lies and fabrications in the “news.”
I do not consent to the whole legal/governmafia system.
I do not consent to taxes.
I do not consent to using money, given it is an archaic practice.
I do not consent to keeping free energy technologies hidden.
I do not consent to any unEthical thing.
Some of these things You may think are necessary – like governmafia, taxes or money itself – but these are things foisted on Humanity by Ones who lust to have the power to control Us. Granted, money started in scarcity (We’re past that today) to make sure work was not left to Some while Others did nothing and just took. But any more, with tech They hide, money is unnecessary.
See Money… Do We Need It? linked below.
I deal with that whole legal/governmafia system under duress only!
What do You refuse to consent to? Let Me know in the comments. And humbly, please check out the articles linked below. I offer a way We can solve for the moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet.
I Do Not Consent! (article): @amaterasusolar/i-do-not-consent
Money... Do We Need It? (article): @amaterasusolar/money-do-we-need-it
Obsoleting Money (article): @amaterasusolar/obsoleting-money
Calling a Legalate a Law (article): @amaterasusolar/calling-a-legalate-a-law
Planned Obsolescence (article): @amaterasusolar/planned-obsolescence
Beneath the Beasts! (article): @amaterasusolar/beneath-the-beasts
Do You Grasp that It’s Us Against Them? (article): @amaterasusolar/do-you-grasp-that-its-us-against-them
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.
