Humans have three things that are involved with governance in society: Our flesh, Our property, and how We interact. None of Us want Our flesh willfully hurt or killed without Our fully informed consent – yes, Some like pain and will consent to being hurt, and though, in My opinion, weird, it surely is fine amongst consenting adults.
None of Us want Our property willfully taken or damaged without Our consent. No One likes to be robbed, or have something of Ours sabotaged.
And none of Us like to be defrauded – which can only happen willfully and without fully informed consent.
Everything else in life is a matter of taste. Outside these three areas, Some may love something while Others may hate it. But outside the three, not everyOne will be upset if We do them – and it is annoyance, not outrage that is produced when a behavior is looked down upon. They are personal – they don’t involve Others, necessarily.
Long ago, well into the mists of time, the three Laws emerged. Barring ideological norms in society – some might have religious overlays, or emulative norms, that add layers to these Laws – these three behaviors could clearly be seen as unacceptable.
And so, the Laws were stated and Common Law emerged with these at the foundation.
The three Laws of Ethics (Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do):
If none of Us did these things ever, Our societies would be happy and living in abundance today. (Helpful technologies would not be withheld, stealing the benefits from Others – for profit and control – as one example.)
Of course, though most of Us will keep these Laws – We do not defraud, steal, sabotage, torture, or kill One anOther or Others’ things – there clearly are Ones who have no compunction in doing them. Psychopaths, in particular, will do these things in a heartbeat if They see some benefit for Themselves.
And so… They, the pirates, the psychopaths, brought the “law of the sea” – admiralty “law” – onto the land to supersede Natural Law (which the three Laws are an expression of). The legal system was set up such that anything can be made “acceptable” or “forbidden. And profit/control drives that system.
Rarely are the Laws upheld.
So I ponder why People accept a system that is so unEthical that any breaking of the Laws can be “okay” because Some passed a “law” (legalate) saying so.
It’s legal (but unEthical) to spray toxins onto food to preserve the food for much longer than it would last normally, not inform the consumer of the specifics of what is used up front, and still call the food “organic.” Nothing sprayed to enhance longevity is organic.
Plenty of other unEthical things are legal.
And legally (but not Ethically) People can be arrested for collecting rain water or smoking a beneficial herb. And other Ethical things too are “illegal” – I do not doubt You can find more.
Most of the legal system and its twisting of Ethics involves someOne’s profit. If some powerful (moneyed) Ones will profit from a legalate being added to “the books” (the number of which no One knows), a bit of money given to the right hands will bring forth “laws” that are unEthical.
What do We expect from a system developed initially by pirates?
For this reason, I cannot consent to the psychopathic legal system, nor to the governmafia systems set up on that unEthical foundation. As an Ethical One, it is even My duty not to consent. To consent to a system that will let unEthical things (for profit) slide, and bash People for Ethical things (for profit) is untenable.
Yes, I ponder why People think that system, working against Humanity and Ethics, is to be consented to… I know They have never looked at things with Ethical awareness, so indoctrinated by the Ones who control the legalates, for the Ones in power ensure that Ethics are not taught.
I surely hope to awaken enough of Us to the detriment the legal/governmafia mess created for Humanity on Our planet. Enough of Us seeing that, with the three Laws, and all of Us arresting (or calling for help in arresting) Any who break the true Laws, We can govern Ourselves well and Ethically.
And about the motive to make unEthical things legal and Ethical things illegal… Money, irrespective of form, is the driver. And (unEthically) those moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet (by virtue of money) hide the beneficial tech that would make accounting for Our energy added into a system (the foundational function of “money”) pointless.
Humanity would blossom, Our planet be well stewarded, abundance would flow to All of Us, the Laws upheld, if We did not need to account for the energy We’re adding into a system. If We did not need money to survive at all, let alone richly, We would find what We love to do that helps the most and fulfill Our potential. And all We would need are the three true Laws, the Laws of Ethics.
In closing, I must ask You… Are You an Ethical One? Will You stand on higher ground, Ethical ground, than the wretchedly unEthical legal system? Will You too withdraw Your consent, dealing with the system under duress only?
I will hope so.
For more, please see the links below.
Ethical Anarchy (article): @amaterasusolar/ethical-anarchy
Find What You Love to Do that Helps the Most (article): @amaterasusolar/find-what-you-love-to-do-that-helps-the-most
Giving Authority (article): @amaterasusolar/giving-authority
Beneficial Technologies Stifled for Profit and Control (article): @amaterasusolar/beneficial-technologies-stifled-for-profit-and-control
Your Attention is Worth More to Them than Money (article): @amaterasusolar/your-attention-is-worth-more-to-them-than-money
Obligations to the State (article): @amaterasusolar/obligations-to-the-state
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.
