Many of the rich people in modern times are entrepreneurs, unlike in ancient times, they were all princes and generals. Their way to get rich is to serve the poor and make money for themselves. This is

I am not familiar with the pipeline you are talking about, but most of the controversial pipelines I know about are (or were) being built to export natural gas to other countries (where the price is much

Yes, venture capitalists CAN invest in crypto. But the point is they are not NEEDED to invest in crypto projects. That is the big change in the equation: previously venture capital (rich people) got to

Perhaps that is why I didn't enjoy it: in each episode I anticipated the unhappy ending so I found the show very predictable.

My own view on SARS-CoV-2, as a physician, is that it is no more deadly than a seasonal flu, with a better-than-99% survival rate for most. You may be a physician (out of curiosity, what is your specialty?),

Interesting. I hope you write a followup post in a while to let us know how it went.

Overhyped. Story and character choices were unrealistic, violence and constant headshots each episdoe were just exploitive and didn't add to story. After every episode I felt depressed by the end. I waded

If it makes your miserable life happier that 99.9% of people can upvote a post of mine and you can use your giant chunk of money to downvote all of my posts 90% to make yourself feel better, I've done

Not really. External factors caused Trump to lose money despite his actions in office. He had pandemic-related losses in his real estate holdings.

I found this article today that goes into more depth about vaccinated vs unvaccinated transmission rates (it is written by a doctor, not a journalist or blogger):

We will not see eye to eye on this and I really don't have the energy for it either. I'll see you on a less controversial topic. I hope you don't mind me commenting on your conversation with honeydue:

. This particular vaccine protects you , or rather, means you'll get an easier form of Covid, not that you won't pass it on. Inaccurate. Covid vaccines not only reduce the chance you will have a bad case

Did you see that officer shot the Girl in the face? She wasn't violent. So, if a group of people start shouting "Hang thaholder", put up a gallows outside your home, then one of them breaks through

What is the basis for writing them off while accepting the claims of others? Strong political bias. I respectfully disagree. I can write off someone's claims without it being based on political bias. Instead,

As a case in point to the bias I'm referring to, read the response of howweroll above. He manages to conclude that a paper shows promising results for Ivermectin from "70 summaries of clinical

Sorry, but did you actually read the study you cited? Here is a key quote from your citation: Importantly, close to 70 trials worldwide are currently testing the clinical benefit of ivermectin to treat

If we lived in a world that made sense, this would just be an open debate that scientists and doctors could have publicly without being ridiculed or having their credibility questioned. I fully agree with

I have looked at the real research on Ivermectin. And as @davidpakman states, in the larger scale randomized tests, there was no evidence it was effective against covid: Futher, in direct contradiction