sure, they are "lucky" to get 10% back as curation rewards if they are not curating. meanwhile it favors the exact opposite of what you describe - smaller votes are easier to gain much higher

if everyone piles onto 5:01 then I will vote at 4:55 and the overall curation for that post is reduced, then someone else clips down to 4 for their personal gain and before you know it 100 accounts are

our payout should be the same regardless of what others do. this is not a curation system - it is a braindead staking system. the ordering of votes was supposed to reward curators, and the reverse auction

I would love to be wrong about it but I'm pretty sure that people competing into the depths of the reverse auction is the only thing that makes curation spread across a wide array of posts more efficient

ok great, by the sound of this we now have a million curation trails that are just going to pile onto the 1st second, and the voting will become even more concentrated since the reverse auction isn't

ah holy crap, I just noticed you said this.. I really appreciate the effort of warning people. I did change it a while back after looking at hivetasks and noticing some 100% votes that weren't my own,

that's certainly a concept that's crossed my mind ^_~ if I were to work on an NFT game, then hive/engine seems like the best way to do it.

missed the tournament, wish these are 'upcoming' for 10x longer

Do you think that oldschool yugioh/MtG/pokemon cards would be worth thousands if nothing new was ever added and people lost interest in those games?

wow, I didn't even notice this buried in notifications: LOL (edit: message sent now)

Don't worry too much about sim power as a small city, it will go up and down depending on how much sim tokens you hold across longer periods of time, and determines a few things like voting weight for

I love this, it's so pretty _

hey, you work fast _ it reminds me I needed to vote for the proposal. also to confirm I just tested and both are fixed from my view. This saves me some frustration in transfers each day, so thanks!

@stoodkev I think there is a new bug in keychain preventing multiple transfers: open tokens menu transfer tokens to some account [SEND NULL] [CONFIRM] this works return to menu for tokens transfer tokens

A contest about creating contests, very meta _ Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Ok, so if it's dcity contest I think probably we can rule out micro-cities and play around the idea that the people competing have something

MUAHAHAHA (◣◡◢) I think this will be huge, just need multiple ways of creating intrinsic value/utility for it and everyone will go nuts rolling all day. I don't know how hard it will be to actually add

oooo is this the loss token we talked about? I'll have to find some time to do a little testing once this has some integrations. The site having a dedicated token will be good for everyone involved I think.

The title is true. "oh my God"

reminds me of this: unfortunately most of my other crypto is LTC which is also down, so the ratio between HP:LTC is not much better than it was before, something like 295HP per LTC which is still really