I think that all of your points are valid. There are lots of rewards to be gotten without @onealfa's votes, so you should feel free to speak.

For the record, I am not really trying to keep a neutral position, I am more stating the facts about how the blockchain works and what each of us are able to do. @onealfa has 7% stake on the platform. It is a lot but by no means is it a tyranny of the majority. In fairness to him... he has acquired his stake and is using it as he sees fit, which we all should be able to do. Again, I am only talking about how everything works. If you don't like how he operates, you are fully capable to not support him. You are also capable of downvoting him. If you still are not satisfied, you can start a tribe or blockchain where the rules are different. I am just stating what you are capable of doing.

As POB is distributed, there will be more and more vote diversity and the core POB'ers from the beginning will have a large stake in the platform. There will be others who bought in or got upvoted into holding a decent stake. Many of the LEO authors that are tagging #proofofbrain on their posts do very good work and should be welcomed.

This is just the beginning of POB and there will be many twists and turns yet. My opinion is that fighting on this blockchain cannot solve anything, only make it look bad. POB became the place to be because we created a culture of great content and great curation. If we can lead by example and continue with that, 93% of the stake of POB could end up on board (maybe even the other 7%)... good things will continue to come. If we focus too heavily on 7% that is not on board... we do a dis-service to the other 93%.