I think it is easy to talk when you want to maintain a neutral position to ensure some population of both sides, here is a clear abuse of power which is being exercised by a character who only cares about an economic benefit since all his attention is only on leofinance, In case that's not bad, what I should consider is that it is a disproportionately unequal battle, which leaves a long list of questions and I will take the trouble to name a few:

Do I have to be an active member of leofinance to get good rewards?

Should I keep quiet about what I think so that daddy @onealfa will reward me?

How should I define my stay in pob?

What tab or measure determines when I make a comment right or wrong?

Is the platform governed by those with more than 9% participation?

Do you have objectivity when printing a negative vote?

Is the community aware that anyone who thinks differently from this elite will have the same fate?

Is this called playing fair?

Is it within the rules?

Are there rules for this?

Oops I could go on but I'd rather wait for some other views!