After three years, the “emergency use authorization” has finally ended. But not so fast.
On Easter Monday, on the same day the Biden Administration announced a new $5 billion plan to aid pharmaceutical companies in developing new COVID vaccines, Joey B. took a “significant and symbolic” step toward a POST Pandemic World, signing on H.J.Res 7, ending the three-year-long National COVID-19 “state of emergency.”
The resolution passed the House despite almost 200 Democrats voting against it. The White House originally expressed opposition to ending the COVID-19 emergency.
“Is there a catch,” I immediately wondered. Why now? Did Robert Kennedy Jr’s presidential announcement have something to do with it? Was the jig finally up? Was it because there is another emergency on the horizon?
Upon combing through the Ministry of Truth’s gobbledygook, I got a headache. I usually can synthesize dense content, but I was very bewildered because the government sites seemed to say that the emergency was over, but not really. In other words, it looks like the official emergency is over but the deadly EUA lives on. In fact, the FDA is poised to approve a 7th dose of the COVID mRNA vaccine by emergency use authorization. (It may not have worked after six doses, but seven is a lucky charm.)
During my research, I asked Ryan Cristián of The Last American Vagabond if he had covered the topic, given his thorough reporting. He agreed it was designed to practically be impossible to understand. I have to admit, I was relieved to learn he was also confused and that it wasn’t a cognitive fart on my part.
“There is a lot of confusion about the EUA because there are actually a few different emergency declarations,” agrees Dani Lasher, President of Informed Choice Maryland.
The EUA was published in March 2020 based on an emergency declaration issued a month prior in accordance with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act.
“To my knowledge, that emergency declaration is independent of Biden’s emergency declaration and does not end just because Biden’s does, nor does the Public Health Emergency (PHE) first declared in January 2020 by the Secretary of Health & Human Services (HHS). That declaration is slated to expire in May,” says Lasher.
She is referencing HHS’s March 13, 2023 announcement where they declared that the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) under the Public Health Service (PHS) Act will expire on May 11, 2023.
An EUA declaration is distinct from and not dependent on a PHE declaration under section 319 of the PHS Act, and therefore EUA may remain in effect beyond the duration of the section 319 PHE declaration if all other statutory conditions are met.
Said in a different way, the PHE declared by HHS under the PHS Act will not impact FDA’s ability to authorize devices, which includes tests, treatments, or vaccines for emergency use. Furthermore, existing emergency use authorizations (EUAs) for products will remain in effect and the agency may continue to issue new EUAs going forward when the criteria for issuance are met.
So if you are still following, the GOP bill to end the emergency does not truly end it. Seemingly there are several emergencies and several state emergency responses that have expiration dates that are not tied to the end of the federal emergency declarations.
Waivers will still be issued and EUA products will seemingly remain for eternity in violation of known federal law.
Before I attempt to parse the mind-bending Doublespeak, I need to give you a little refresher on Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). First off, it’s really a humongous loophole to accelerate Big Pharma products that have not been fully vetted for (real) “safety.”
The official explanation is that EUA allows the use of medical products, such as vaccines and therapeutics, during public health emergencies, including pandemics, before they are fully approved by the FDA.
“Quick there’s a fire.” Oh wait, it’s a false fire. But quick, it’s still an emergency.
The EUA authority allows the FDA, based on the evaluation of available data, to authorize the use of unapproved or uncleared medical products or unapproved or uncleared uses of approved or cleared medical products following a determination and declaration of emergency, provided certain criteria are met. The authorization ends when the declaration of emergency is terminated or the authorization is revoked by the agency.
So basically EUA products are NOT held to the same standards. It’s “FDA-issued” vs “FDA-approved.” This is a crucial distinction.
Meanwhile, the biggest audacity of the EUA is that it was all predicted upon “no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.”
What a crock.
The reality is that there were/are so many alternatives beyond Ivermectin and HCQ that are, after all, considered allopathic alternatives. Incidentally, HCQ was taken off of EUA.
Consider that in March 2020, the Food and Drug Administration launched Operation Quack Hack to go after hundreds of people, including Alex Jones, Mark Grenon of Genesis Church, and myself, who stand for natural immunity and natural remedies. In my case, they came after my company HoneyColony for our super-chelated 4,000 ppm silver and selling Vitamin C. Oh yeah, and for using the word "preventative." Health Ranger aka Mike Adams had to help me break this story since I am a poster child for what is now being referred to as the “Censorship Industrial Complex.”
To put things in perspective, prior to the Rona Regime, there was an average of only 100 products approved annually under EUA. During the last pandemic – H1N1 in 2009– only 17 EUA products were approved for the year. But then, in 2020, EUA was exploited up the wazoo — suddenly there were 100 applications plus a month, and more than 320 EUAs were doled out. Many were crappy.
Remember, for instance, the infamous PCR RT non-test test? When I started covering this Plandemic in early January 2020, there was ONE test under EUA. It was a CDC test. In weeks, one test approval turned into six and then 13. Can someone say cottage industry?
Many of us tried to hammer that the “test” was unreliable and should never have been used for diagnostic purposes. Inventor Kary Mullis said it wasn’t a diagnostic tool, but he conveniently died in August 2019 so he could not speak up.
PCR tests are unreliable due to the amplification threshold. Anything over 28-30 cycles will create an abundance of false positives. In the USA, the cycle threshold was said to be 35 cycles. The WHO recommended 40 to 45 cycles. So they varied. High amplifications can pick up the presence of any virus. Totally worthless.
Additionally, there were also tainted tests that made folks sick with “coronavirus.” Do you remember? I do. I was covering the coronavirus blow-by-blow, 12 hours a day with Google whistleblower Zach Vorhies under lockdown while deep in the jungle of Costa Rica.
Lasher recalls when everyone had their hair on fire over a EUA for a specific PCR test being recalled. “They were actually recalling many of the tests, and replacing them with new ones — very quietly without making waves,” adds Lasher “The ones being recalled coincidentally happened to note they could cross-react with dozens of other viruses while new ones didn’t cross-react with any. A convenient way to cut out some of the false positives and reduce the overall positivity rate AFTER the vaccine was introduced, don’t you think?”
Alas, no one tested the "tests" and they were issued onto the market. They were the abracadabra trick tool to boost the cases and drum up a full-on resurgence or variant hotspot at will. In addition to the PCR tests, there were molecular and antigen tests, serology tests; Point-Of-Care tests; home collection tests; multi-analyte tests, and more.
And, if you recall, Remdesivir aka "Run Death is Near," which killed my uncle with a one-two-punch that included a ventilator, was also approved under EUA for COVID-19 under the name Veklury. The drug’s potential benefits for such use did not outweigh its known & potential risks. But who cares. Depopulation was the aim.
PART 2 The point here is that EUA cuts corners for Big Pharma and, more so offers, immunity from liability against experimental "therapies." These emergency declarations afford the flexibility to the federal government to waive or modify specific requirements in a range of other areas and also allow the authorization of medical countermeasures and provide liability immunity to providers who administer services, among other things.
And so in 2020, they busted out their toxic hand sanitizers, put X’s and stickers on the ground, forced people to wear masks, erected pop-up tents, and nostril-raped millions with PCR tests with cycle thresholds cranked up, indoctrinating them into the Cult of Covid.
And then on Aug 24, 2021, the FDA approved the first-ever COVID-19 “vaccine,” to jab the masses. Remember they needed to literally change the definition of "vaccine" versus being honest, and admitting that they were testing a never-before mRNA technology. In this Post-Rona world, humans have replaced lab rats.
Over the last two years, the Biden Administration has effectively implemented the largest adult vaccination program in U.S. history, with nearly 270 million Americans receiving at least one shot of a COVID-19 “vaccine.”
They were ALL under EUA. Experimental. Non-FDA approved.
Overall, there has been no real review or scrutiny of the EUA processes. In September 2022, despite little press or fanfare, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General published a 51-page report titled FDA Repeatedly Adapted Emergency Use Authorization Policies To Address the Need for COVID-19 Testing.
They reviewed the EUA processes and concluded that the FDA repeatedly adapted the EUA to “help ensure that the nation’s COVID-19 testing needs were met,” but that as a result, test quality was compromised.
Did anything change? Nope.
If you read the fine print over and over again, you’ll conclude that the Administration has pathed the way for EUAs for Covid-19 products like “Vaccines” to continue. They purposely left it open-ended. And indeed on Apr 14, 2023 HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra announced that in the coming weeks he will issue an amendment to the declaration under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act for medical countermeasures against COVID-19.
“In the month remaining before the end of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE) declared under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act, HHS will continue to work closely with its partners, including Governors, state, local, Tribal, and territorial agencies, industry, and advocates to ensure an orderly transition.”
They claim there needs to be of a reasonable period to allow for proper dispositioning to also provide notice and information to “all impacted stakeholders.”
Therefore “the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency alone does not automatically terminate PREP Act coverage for countermeasures.” If the EUA declaration was terminated, a notice will be published in the Federal Register.
The HHS states:
Even once vaccines, tests, and treatments move away from being distributed under a USG agreement as they transition to traditional pathways for procurement, distribution, and payment, PREP Act coverage will not automatically terminate in all instances. Rather, the duration of PREP Act coverage for COVID-19 countermeasures will be determined by the terms of the PREP Act declaration in place at the time.
Importantly, the ending of the PHE declared by HHS under the PHS Act will not impact FDA’s ability to authorize devices (including tests), treatments, or vaccines for emergency use. Existing emergency use authorizations (EUAs) for products will remain in effect and the agency may continue to issue new EUAs going forward when the criteria for issuance are met.
If you want to try to make sense of the madness yourself, read the fact sheet: HHS Announces Intent to Amend the Declaration Under the PREP Act for Medical Countermeasures Against COVID-19.
Unless I’m reading it incorrectly, the immunity from the EUA lasts until 2024 giving Big Harma plenty of time to create a new emergency. I’d venture to say the true intent is to only provide Americans with EUA vaccines, which come with a bulletproof liability waiver through the PREP Act that the licensed vaccines do not have. Today these non-FDA-approved jabs are on kids' vaccine schedules. Thus, Big Pharms is protected against the spectrum/recipients in perpetuity.
Resources:
@ladybee. Email her: [email protected].
You can read Maryam Henein's full article archive HERE.
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Follow us on SoMee, Telegram, HIVE, Flote, Minds, MeWe, Twitter, Gab, What Really Happened and GETTR.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.
