I haven't downvoted you in the past nor do I usually downvote posts I don't understand. Given your latest downvotes that make 0 sense and only hurt Steem (such as downvoting cross-posts of new authors on Steem) I made a quick decision that this was a garbage post that didn't deserve the rewards.

If you feel you have been unfairly downvoted by curangel which @ocdb follows with it's downvotes then take it up with them. They have open communication and a "decentralized" way to nominate posts for downvotes based on statistics of votes received by the same accounts over and over. While we are against bringing down posts to 0 because the important thing is to encourage genuine curation of other authors instead of self-voting/vote-trading which goes against the EIP, we will adapt and drop the trail if that becomes an issue and is abused. We have mentioned it quite a few times to them that we don't accept posts being brought to 0.

Anyway, I'm a bit tired of attempting to google translate and respond to these with you translating them the same way in mind. It does not make the communication easy but kind of funny at times:

The way you guys have been openly targetting users in posts, often times innocent authors that have not had anything to do with you such as @taskmaster4450 is absolutely disgusting and hurts the platform a lot. Even the biggest abusers that retaliate when they don't get their way by targeting curation projects and posts they upvote aren't as damaging as putting targets and encouraging your community to downvote them. Especially when minnows who don't even get curated by you for their original content act on it as well because they don't know any better. I hope the time will come when your community realizes what you're doing just for the extra ROI when the majority of other stakeholders are giving the EIP a try and curating or following curation projects with their votes instead of doing everything in their power to just increase their stake by all means.

I'm sure you won't be able to understand what I'm saying through google translate, much like how your analogies are going over my head but there is a reason you were downvoted from this curation project in the first place. It's not because they are "profiting" from it like you guys like to mention in your posts where you try to justify your retaliatory actions. The biggest reason is excessive self-voting or vote-trading, if it wasn't that there would be no reason to downvote you in the first place and being able to point out the self-voting and vote-trading you don't have to be a genius or understand the language, numbers tell it well enough.