I love and also hate at the same time when some of the so-called conspiracy theories I have been throwing around, through my blog, for a couple of years are gradually maturing from concepts to ideas preceding the materialization of such theories. My ego somehow feels good about being right, but my soul kind of feels shitty about the direction the world looks to be heading.
Yesterday, our beloved fellow Americans celebrated 22 years since 9/11, but that's not much to celebrate about such an event because if you do a bit of digging into the topic you will realize it was a coup. 9/11 served the purpose of giving America an official reason to invade Afghanistan, siphon billions in military resources which have only made the military complex richer, and the government to come up with more security measures at airports and come back with an empty hand after years and years of war in that foreign country.
They literally destroyed that country for nothing. They didn't even catch Bin Laden... They couldn't, cuz the man was a CIA-made agent. It was all a hoax, and as mentioned before all we got left with was a war-ravaged country and less travel freedom. You see when we talk of freedom being stolen from us individuals by oftentimes non-elected individuals we are not actually pointing towards an overnight heist.
The so-called thieves have carefully planned their moves decades in advance. Even the law-enforced obligatoriness of wearing the damn seat belt in your car should have rang a bell to us. How come the state can force the individual to protect his own life, otheriwse risking being fined for that? How's that possible?
Well, 20 years after 9/11 we got the covid pandemic which, as stated by Klaus Schwab many times over the past couple of years was used by unelected individuals and institutions such as the UN, WHO, and the European Commission led by Ursula von der Leyen in exercising more power over us and indulging into more freedom stealing from us. Remember these "green certificates" that the European Union introduced a couple of years ago which would allow or not individuals to travel or have access to certain public places?
Well, these were somehow the product of Ursula von der Leyen, whose husband was a lobbyist for Pfizer... Why on earth was she so desperate to introduce such freedom-limiting measures? Two reasons: make the people take the jab which pocketed her and Pfizer a lot of cash and train the masses into accepting digital cash, digital IDs, and all sort of digital passports and other related shit.
It is worth mentioning that Ursula von der Leyen was appointed head of the European Commission, she didn't get there by vote. But then again, Klaus Schwab admitted many times in the past that the World Economic Forum has pursued the mission of integrating its members in key leading positions for years and years already.
Whether we like it or not, or whether we see it or not, European countries are clearly giving up on their sovereignty and embracing a centralized governance system that is not even led by the European Union anymore, but by so-called leaders and organizations that nobody voted for. I didn't vote for WHO or the UN to decide on any of my fundamental freedoms. Probably many others feel the same on this matter.
“Today I want to focus on AI and digital infrastructure. As it has been described, AI has risks but also offers tremendous opportunities. The crucial question is how to harness a rapidly changing technology.
“In the EU, in 2020, we presented the first-ever law on artificial intelligence. We want to facilitate innovation while building trust. But we need more. What the world does now will shape our future. I believe that Europe — and its partners — should develop a new global framework for AI risks.”
“Many of you are familiar with the COVID-19 digital certificate. The EU developed it for itself. The model was so functional and so trusted that 51 countries on 4 continents adopted it for free. Today, the WHO uses it as a global standard to facilitate mobility in times of health threats.”
-Ursula von der Leyen source
The plan for these health certificates was very simple from the beginning and one integral part of it was to get the masses accustomed to turning their personal data into a "digital form". I don't know how much sense that statement makes, but think for a second about the so-called digital future that von der Leyen is envisioning for us...
Digital IDs, digital cash(programmable money), digital health passports, social credit scores, and carbon credit scores... That's what Ursula has in mind when envisioning a digital future for the EU. However, if you watch her interviews closely you'll notice she's reading all the shit from a piece of paper that is most certainly not written or thought by her.
The WHO, UN, and EU Commission do not advocate Bitcoin, decentralized blockchain-based social media platforms such as Hive, and borderless anonymous transfers. They can't benefit from such tech for their plans. For someone who's tames and fine with the system, there's no problem with all of the above, but for an outlaw like myself, the future envisioned by von der Leyen is not an option.
Niger Ferguson was de-banked a few months ago by being an open month against the political system and the elites puppeting our so-called world leaders. The man was literally denied having access to a bank account at any bank in the UK. He became a "non persona". In the future restricting even more freedoms from such a person will be even easier.
By no means do I believe that everything discussed in the media and all the conspiracy theories out there will become reality, but why not stay prepared and why not say NO once in a while and take the risk? Is the system threatening you with a fine for not complying? Well, think about what will happen once you start accepting everything the system is introducing for the sake of "your safety and collective health".
Think again before accepting to sell a bit of your freedom for safety, cuz at some point you might end up not having any liberties left to trade for safety...
Thanks for your attention,
Adrian
