Relative morality is an oxymoron.
you claim:
"There is no good or evil. No good or bad.
All relative."
You declare a negative singular claim. You say no to two things. This has nothing to do with good or bad being relative.
Then you go on with your example, which declare that there is a morality to be found, but it is situation dependent, subject dependent, context dependent. So you acknowledge objective morality now? But why the intro then.
A morality can be used when we find the morality of something - if you say there is no good or evil, you found a morality.
If it were relative it would both be and not be context dependent at the same time, because it is relative.
Relativism is a mind virus. It might even confuse you enough to believe that moral relativism, is the moral of the story here. Which is the oxymoron I was claiming in the top of this reply.
RE: Right and Wrong