Multiple vaccine debates concluded swiftly & unequivocally

Are vaccines safe for everybody?

No - manufacture product package insert, the injured and dead people.

Are all individuals assessed for vaccine damage susceptibility?

No - every child is not genetically tested, does not have a total condition assessment and complete medical history conducted before receiving a vaccination.

Do vaccines cause an array of harmful effects including death?

Yes - manufacture product package insert, the injured and dead people.

Are all the harmful effects of vaccines visible & known?

No - ZERO long term studies.

Are vaccines safe for anybody?

Unknown - ZERO long term studies.

Has enough research been conducted on vaccine safety?

No - ZERO long term control studies. ZERO long term studies of the rapidly changing net effect of the interactions of all the different pathogens and toxins that make up the vaccine schedule.

Are vaccines manufactured to be as safe as they can be?

No - research is expensive and revealing. The manufacturing has considerations like, shelf-life, "efficacy" (by their narrow standards,) the amount of future product to be injected and profitability of the product.

Has Glyphosate (a probable human carcinogenic contaminant) been found in vaccines?

Yes - Glyphosate is a water soluble toxin which is rapidly becoming ubiquitous in the environment. It's in the air, the water, the food and now, the vaccines......surprise!

Do conflicts of interest surround the research, manufacture and regulation of vaccines?

Yes - regulators getting jobs at the companies they were regulating, data manipulation of research, bundles of money involved, politicians and law-makers invested in the manufacturers.......

Have vaccine manufacturers been caught manipulating research data relating to vaccine product safety?

Yes - there's is a growing laundry list of examples, William Thompson of the CDC being one of the latest.

Is it possible to hold vaccine manufacturers to account for faulty vaccine product that causes harm by suing them?

No - changes to the law prevent vaccine manufacturers from being sued for the harm their faulty products cause.

Do governments pay compensation to people harmed by vaccines?

Yes - lots but nowhere near enough.

Should people have a choice over whether or not to have a medical intervention for themselves or their children?

Yes - If you don't have freedom over self, then who is your owner? The state and by extension (lobbied corruption) some psychopathic CEO.

Is it possible to be healthy and resist disease without using vaccines?

Yes - ask healthy human beings since the advent of humanity.

Is it possible to be healthier and more resistant to disease without using vaccines?

Yes - ask the dead vaccine injured person.

Is it possible there are other reasons for the decline in some infectious diseases around the advent of vaccine use?

Yes - sanitation, diet......among others.

Is the resurgence of certain infectious disease potentially attributable to the vaccines themselves?

Yes - vaccine attenuated atypical strain shedding, people with vaccine damaged immune systems.....


If even one of these statements and answers are true.......and I believe they all are, then that is enough to question the entire approach to vaccines from regulation to manufacture to use. Not to do so would be a crime against humanity. To blindly allow corruption to force feed us fear and lies for the sake of profit and stock value (and perhaps other more degenerate purposes) whilst turning our back on the millions of people affected by bogus science, nefarious agendas and propaganda is unconscionable.

If we share the goal to improve people's health, everyone's health, then let's do that......the best way we can....by looking at whole body health, the environment in which it lives and the distribution of resource and knowledge.

Isn't a better way to achieve health perhaps to stop using toxic chemicals, to stop releasing toxins into our environment, to stop eating, inhaling, drinking and injecting toxins into our bodies and to bring back integrity to scientific research? The costs for human hubris are mounting up.....and they are already intolerable.

Whatever your point of view, surely there is one thing everyone can agree upon....relative to vaccines, we have drifted very far from the the original discovery.......catch one wild, natural and relatively harmless pathogen (cow pox) and develop partial or complete immunity to a more serious pathogen (small pox.) Naturally acquired resistance. An opportunity for a enduring strengthening of health provided by nature through infection. No toxins, no strain manipulation, no invasive and unnatural infection method, no forced intervention, no multiple doses, no mixture of pathogens delivered simultaneously. The idea of a vaccine was to do no harm but bring benefits. There would be no need to ever force someone to do something which only, demonstrably caused them a benefit. The harm of vaccines today is everywhere and is it any wonder? Perhaps vaccines could become more like they were supposed to be, with more accountability, transparency, less consideration to cost, better research.......sadly, trust takes moments to destroy and a lifetime to earn. Does anyone who read this far trust the pharmaceutical companies or the bodies that regulate them? Will you ever trust them again?


Happy Steeming

H2
H3
H4
3 columns
2 columns
1 column
Join the conversation now
Logo
Center