They say the show is not competently written when only 3 episodes have been released. I am not taking what they say seriously. I will admit early on they do make some good points, acknowledging that there are fans who do not like this show for valid reasons. However, I think they are downplaying the blatant review bombing with the vague criticisms such as "bad writing," "bad acting, "bad story," and so on. It's fair to acknowledge that those who do praise the show aren't as specific at times with what they like about it, but at the same time I feel like we must acknowledge those vague "criticisms" the so-called informed reviewers are blasting on those websites. Particularly when so many of those reviews are also similarly written
The amount of times I have seen those terms "bad writing," and stuff like "bad storyline" thrown around the past week is insane. People think that saying something is "bad" with nothing of substance to back up that claim is valid criticism when it just... isn't. It's childish immaturity, demonstrating that they are incapable of expanding upon their thought outside of "I Don't Like It So It Sucks."
Newsflash: Just because we don't personally vibe with something doesn't automatically make it so that the project sucks! Art is subjective. The individual person is not a God who can make those absolute decisions.
Her's the article if anyone wanna read: https://comicbookmovie.com/tv/star-wars/the-acolyte-review-bombing---a-counter-argument-from-a-traditionalist-a211505#gs.ayhif4
