Its really a shame that "pier review" essentially just means proof reading. There should be a website like google scholar that can show you how many times a study has either failed or succeeded in being replicated
Its really a shame that "pier review" essentially just means proof reading. There should be a website like google scholar that can show you how many times a study has either failed or succeeded in being replicated
RE: Science's Replication Crisis | Peter Ridd and Stefan Molyneux