Two issues.
Holy fuck, proofread.
Secondly; the intent of 230 was to allow opinionated curation of user content, check with the republican congressman who wrote it. This makes the entirety of your point not just wrong, but laughably wrong.
Two issues.
Holy fuck, proofread.
Secondly; the intent of 230 was to allow opinionated curation of user content, check with the republican congressman who wrote it. This makes the entirety of your point not just wrong, but laughably wrong.
RE: Wikipedia should lose section 230