In one of my earlier post I asked the questions in quotes?
"The article explains that "According to EPA spokeswoman Liz Bowman, the men were only “briefly introduced” and “did not discuss chlorpyrifos.” (Bowman, for her part, came to the EPA from the American Chemistry Council, an industry group of which Dow is a member.)"
"Am I the only one who reads this and begins smelling the oh so familiar smell of political Bravo Sierra" In the statement "the men were only “briefly introduced” and “did not discuss chlorpyrifos.” begs "how does she know"?"
"Also why would that information need to be released by a EPA spokeswoman? I have got to wonder if perhaps some alternative news are not as alternative as they would like us to think."
"Sorry the quote is so long but I wanted to make sure the context was not lost by shortening the quote too much."
Source
The truth in the article below is the fact that the entire tittle is predictive programing. Below is a youtube video that explains exactly how predictive programing is used to produce mind control (Mind control means Government etymologically). It also shares the fact that predictive programing main goal is to the predict future.
Predictive programing has two distinct characteristics that are easy to spot.
Here is another article from. ANTI MEDIA "US Threatens War With Syria Over Chemical Attack That Hasn’t Even Happened Yet" and it is discussing fear porn (In my opinion).
In the tittle of the article is the phrase "US Threatens War With Syria Over Chemical Attack", which is fear porn at best, because the psychopaths know the public fears war and that fear produces adrenaline, which require a host of chemical compounds produced by the body, which inhibits clear and organized thinking. Another predictive programing phrase is "That Hasn’t Even Happened Yet".
This phrase makes you think that government has told on themselves by threatening war over an action that as the phrase says "hasn't even happened yet". When however you take the sinful action of actually reading the article you find the narrative is actually trying to give kudos to government for attempting to prevent war while at the same time condemning the same government factions.
Here is a great place to check out the fight or flight response. Psych Central
The second characteristic that can help people nail down a media source as a predictive programing outlet for mind control (In my Opinion) is the fact that the article will be full of claims made through testimony and very little evidence proving the facts. I call this the claim farming technique. You create so many claims with little or no evidence that the environment is landscaped with false claims.
The truth is that videos and photo's do not constitute evidence for the narrative that goes with the so called evidence and this is what all the links to other articles amounts to "Testimony". Real journalism requires that you present things within the article that validate or invalidate the source, present real evidence backing the source and provide a way for the reader to check the source. Critical thinking requires that the reader think about what they are being told vs reality, what the evidence is, and who or what is the source of the evidence.
Media is not a good way to get facts or views on what the world is. The best source for such in my opinion is the facts of your own experience.
"If you haven't checked something out yourself, have no opinion on it because that opinion is likely to be predictively harmful not for your benefit or the population's." By @masoncerritos