I actually think what happened with Trump was not part of the plan. The panic and overreaction that hasn't really stopped afterwards seems to support that.
Plus news week already having covers printed for Madam President... that didn't work out.
I sure as hell didn't want her to win as I've done too much research on her and I consider her one of the most corrupt politicians in U.S. history. I didn't used to have a problem with her.
Still even considering that I was pretty sure she was going to win. I even said it up to a year before the election. She had too many of the boxes checked for the people that get to be president. She also had the media pushing for her hard. Perhaps too hard... that might be part of the backfire, some of the people that don't usually notice the media bias might have actually noticed it for a change.
The Seth Rich leaks to wikileaks about DNC and Hillary colluding against Bernie also was bad for her. Very bad.
There was even indications of fraudulent activities going on IN HER favor on election day. I spoke to some people on that day that witnessed it.
Yet at least in PA where a bunch of it was she still lost.
I kind of thought they may have underestimated how much they had to cheat.
Thus why before the election Hillary and Obama both had to tell Trump not to be a poor sport when he lost, because the system works...
Yet when she didn't win... it was full on panic mode and it was clear some news outlets didn't quite know what to do.
Then the hypocrisy kicked in and Hillary and Obama began doing what they told Trump not to do...
Could it all be a show... a spectacle.... yes
However, I do think something may have gone off script in this and they are reacting to that.
RE: Why is propaganda effective? How does mental corruption take place?