My personal opinion on this subject: ( Beware : limited empathy )
+ ➕ impact from banning 🤖
Greater emphasis on player skill: With AI banned from gaming, players would have to rely solely on their own skill and strategy to succeed. This could create a more level playing field, where success is determined by player talent rather than access to technology. Skilled player dominates vs weak player demotivate ( ever wonder why your win rate is above 40% ?)
More social interaction: Without AI assistants, players would have to rely on each other for help and support. This could create a more social and collaborative gaming environment, where players work together to overcome challenges and achieve success. ( Either you involve in guild/union/cooperation or be solo like kirito )
Increased immersion: AI assistants can sometimes detract from the immersive experience of the game, as players may feel less connected to their in-game actions. Banning AI could help players feel more immersed in the game, as they would be fully engaged in every aspect of the gameplay. i.e spent more time in mav chat update or weekly townhall, otherwise you missed out. ( too bad for those only can spend 1 hour per day or lesss cause of other obligation )
Greater challenge: Without AI to automate certain tasks, players may find the game more challenging overall. This could increase the sense of accomplishment and satisfaction that players feel when they succeed, as they would have overcome greater obstacles to reach their goals. ( I guess it's an accomplishment logging in multiple account manually to claim rewards and play within 1 hour per day before lunch break is over )
- ➖ impact from banning 🤖
Slower overall progress in the game: Without AI, players would have to complete tasks manually, which could take significantly longer. This could result in a slower overall progress in the game, as players would spend more time on repetitive tasks such as reward claim and gmae play. ( From a usual 1-2 min matching opponent, possibility even longer as higher rank has less people . If your lower rank than should have no issue cause majority will be there)
Limited accessibility: Players who are unable to dedicate large amounts of time to gaming may find it difficult to keep up with other players who are using AI assistants. This could result in a less inclusive gaming environment, where only those who have a lot of time to spare are able to excel. ( Ever wonder why RPG players gets their dopamine in brain much slower vs FPS player ?)
Reduced earning potential: AI assistants can be used to automate resource gathering and other tasks, which can help players earn in-game currency more quickly. Without AI, players would have to spend more time on these tasks, which could reduce their overall earning potential. ( because I only have 1 hour per day to play, how much game you think I can get once AI bans? 20 game in 1 hour at current is sorta possible without any distraction )
Disruption of the gaming economy: As AI assistants become more common in the gaming economy, their absence could disrupt the balance of the game. This could result in inflation or other unintended consequences, as players are forced to adapt to a new gaming environment. ( AI sometimes uses cards that you didn't know exist or could possibly work but once AI is gone, my only reference of good card usage will rely on top player streamer. Whatever they use in battle, I will have the urge to get them caused I don't wana FOMO )
Less innovation: AI has the potential to enable new forms of gaming experiences and innovation in game design. Banning AI from gaming could stifle this innovation and limit the potential for future growth and development in the gaming industry. ( It will be awesome to see the dominance of KITTY / LAMACRON again before AI was heavily used.. )
*Thank you for reading from a bot generated comment. *
RE: Robotics, Economics and Ethics