In regards to the Aly situation, I'm not claiming that everything that was said about him was said by you, or was said in hive. Much of it was said in mav chat and other discord channels, but it was spurred on by your post calling him out for voting, which he is entitled to do, and has done many times before without incident.
I don't think everyone has to be compelled to explain their voting positions, even if they have a big stake or are a part of the team. In fact, I believe that it's probably not a good thing for even Aggy and Matt to not participate. They are community members and have a vision for how they would like the project to be. Not everyone is capable of seeing that vision, especially when they have only centralized web2 games to work from.
This whole proposal has caused a lot of misinformation and strife in general, mostly because it is so ambiguous. Yes, originally the text was for a human only league, but that's not what it states now.
In fact now it only says, "allows splinterlands the freedom to allow anti-bot measures in modern", but go to any youtube videos and they are saying
This proposal doesn't say anything about banning bots or a human only league, it says "take anti-bot measures", and specifically it only talks in the comments about maybe implementing a cloudflare type IP filtering solution of the api, but generally gives splinterlands the freedom to choose whatever they think is appropriate.
I don't believe anti-bot measures necessarily means banning, confiscation, violation of the terms of service, or other punitive measures, but again the proposal is vague and so was the answers from the team. It seems it would be perfectly acceptable from the proposals language for the team to only continually put in small speed bumps in modern to make it more limited in bot usage and still be in compliance with what may actually pass.
RE: Supporting the Anti-Bot Proposal: A Step Towards Addressing Community Concerns While Keeping Future Possibilities Open