In the previous post in this series we took a look at the anecdotal evidence for the existence of Giants in our past. It has been alleged and as you will see in this post admitted much of the actual skeletal remains discovered throughout the past 100 or so years is said to have been inexplicably hidden away from us over time by academic institutions such as the Smithsonian.
However we did see newspaper reports of discoveries, huge human like footprints and incredibly large Dolmens created out of monumental pieces of stone that give us clues to the existence of Giants in our hidden past.
This post was originally going to be about specific named mythological Giants however I have decided to leave that for a third and final post, so today we'll be looking at the so called Red Haired Giants, a phenomenon I thought prior to researching these posts was contained within North America specifically the in South West? It appears that is not the case, as we shall see.....
When does a myth become truth?
The Red Haired Giants.
Lovelock cave is situated in Churchill County, Nevada in SW USA. It has been known under many names such as Horseshoe cave, Sunset guano cave, Bat cave and Indian cave.
According to the Paiute a tribe that settled the region thousands of years ago, the area was once the home to a tribe of red haired Giants they called the Si-Te-Cah. We pick up the story here in this article from earthmysterynews.com ....
Many Native American tribes tell stories about the long-forgotten existence of a race of humans that were much taller and stronger than ordinary men. These giants are described as both brave and barbaric and legends often mention their cruelty towards whomever they pleased.
The Paiute, a tribe that settled in the Nevada region thousands of years ago, have an outstanding legend about a race of red-haired giants called the Si-Te-Cah. The ancestors of the Paiute described them as savage and inhospitable cannibals.
In the Northern Paiute language, ‘Si-Te-Cah’ literally means ‘tule-eaters.’ Legend has it that the giants came from a distant island by crossing the ocean on rafts built using the fibrous tule plant.
As odd as it may sound, this legend repeats itself all over the Americas, suggesting it might be an incomplete chronicle of a real event that happened long ago.
Image Source
In Crónicas del Perú, sixteenth century Spanish conquistador Pedro Cieza de León recorded an ancient Peruvian tale about the origin of the South American giants. According to legend, they “came by sea in rafts of reeds after the manner of large boats; some of the men were so tall that from the knee down they were as big as the length of an ordinary fair-sized man.”
Could the giants of Peru and the Si-Te-Cah have been survivors of a massive cataclysm who took refuge on the American continent?
Legend tells that the Si-Te-Cah waged war on the Paiute and all other neighboring tribes, spreading terror and devastation. Finally, after years of conflict, the tribes united against the common enemy and began to decimate them. The last remaining red-haired giants were chased off and sought shelter inside a cave. The tribes started a fire at the cave entrance, suffocating and burning alive the Si-Te-Cah. Those driven out by the smoke were also killed.
The tribes then sealed off the mouth of the cave so that no one might set eyes on those who had once plagued their land. They were all but forgotten until a random event brought them back to light.
In 1886, a mining engineer named John T. Reid happened to hear the legend from a group of Paiutes while prospecting near Lovelock, Nevada. The Indians told him that the legend was real and the cave was located nearby. When he saw the cave for himself, Reid knew he was onto something.
Image Source
Reid was unable to begin digging himself but news spread and soon, Lovelock cave was attracting attention. Unfortunately, the attention was profit-driven as guano deposits were discovered inside. A company started by miners David Pugh and James Hart began excavating the precious resource in 1911 and had soon shipped more than 250 tons to a fertilizer company in San Francisco. Any artifacts that might have been discovered were probably neglected or lost.
After the surface layer of guano had been mined, strange objects started to surface. This led to an official excavation being performed in 1912 by the University of California and another one took place in 1924. Reports told about thousands of artifacts being recovered, some of them being truly unusual.
Although their claims have not been verified (it comes as no surprise), sources said the mummified remains of several red-haired ancient giants were found buried in the cave. Measuring between 8 to 10 feet in height, these mummies have since been referred to as the Lovelock Giants.
Another intriguing find was a pair of 15 inch-long sandals that showed signs of having been worn. Allegedly, other unusually large items were recovered but have since been locked away in museum warehouses and private collection.
A piece of evidence that remains on-site until this day is a giant hand print, embedded on a boulder inside Lovelock Cave.
This is interesting as it ties into the Giant footprints I showed you in the last post, one of which was shown to be 200million years old!
It may sound like hyperbole but allowing potential evidence to be buried in museum basements and/or sold off to private collections is a crime against the history of humanity. If the evidence is proven to be real it should be made public so we can learn what really happened in the past and rewrite the history books. If it is bogus, prove it. In my opinion hiding the evidence is almost an admission that we have something extraordinary here that doesn't fit the current narrative in regards to the history of our planet and the species that have walked it in antiquity.
What is academia afraid of? Do they think we can't handle the truth?
Before I get back to the article I want to quickly show you this artcle called.....
Smithsonian admits destruction of thousands of giant human skeletons in the early 1900's.
Here is a few paragraphs from the damning article, please take time to read it through as it proves there has been a conspiracy to cover up the evidence of Giants in the USA.
It reads...
US Supreme Court ruling has forced the Smithsonian institution to release classified papers dating from the early 1900′s that proves the organization was involved in a major historical cover up of evidence showing giants human remains in the tens of thousands had been uncovered all across America and were ordered to be destroyed by high level administrators to protect the mainstream chronology of human evolution at the time.
During the court case, new elements were brought to light as several Smithsonian whistle blowers admitted to the existence of documents that allegedly proved the destruction of tens of thousands of human skeletons reaching between 6 feet and 12 feet in height, a reality mainstream archeology can not admit to for different reasons, claims AIAA spokesman, James Churward.
American Association for Alternative Archeology,
similar to the evidence presented in court.
The evidence came as a blow to the Smithsonian’s lawyers as the bone had been stolen from the Smithsonian by one of their high level curators in the mid 1930′s who had kept the bone all his life and which had admitted on his deathbed in writing of the undercover operations of the Smithsonian.
The newspapers were much more independent back then so reports of discoveries made it to press, the following headlines come from the same source.
Lets finish the original article before we move on...
Needless to say, this discovery has led many into believing the Paiute legend of the Si-Te-Cah might be more than just folklore.
Around the same time as the second Lovelock Cave excavation, another dig revealed a set of equally-disturbing finds. According to a 1931 article published in the Nevada Review-Miner, two giant skeletons had been found buried in a dry lake bed close to Lovelock, Nevada. The over-sized remains measured 8.5, respectively 10 feet in height and were mummified in a manner similar to the one employed by ancient Egyptians.
Another common trait between these mummified giant remains and the ones discovered as far south as Lake Titicaca is the presence of red hair. While some scientists believe the reddish color is a result of the interaction with the environment in which they were buried, the mummies verify the legends, which described the Si-Te-Cah and their kin as red-haired giants.
Proponents of alternative history believe these violent giants were none other than the biblical Nephilim, the forsworn offspring of the ‘Sons of God’ with the ‘daughters of men.’
If this is true, there’s little chance we might get to see any of the giant mummies. Those interested in keeping history secret will never disclose their location.
A fascinating story I think you'll agree, let's face it if the Smithsonian hadn't deliberately destroyed evidence we might be reading about this in mainstream history books. What a shame that certain 'academics' feel that have the right to control what is deemed as history.
There are some interesting threads in that article that link into a previous post I wrote a few months ago When does a myth become truth? Pt3 - The mystery of Puma Punku a place very close to Lake Titicaca which looks like it has been devestated by cataclysmic event. Could these red haired people be one and the same and fled to North America for refuge?
An interesting hypothesis considering the Giant skeletons and red haired mummies have been found all the way from there through to central and North America.
You're probably thinking "What's up with the shape of that skull?" Don't get me started, that's a whole other post!
To me it appears that there is plenty of evidence both avaialable and sadly destroyed to suggest that at a whole new investigation into these 'Giants' should be undertaken. What good are the history books if they are incorrect?
Its difficult to say whether or not the Red Haired Giants of the Northern part of the Americas are linked to the Red Haired Mummies of the South and only when prpoer research is done will a link if there is one is made. However I believe there is more than enough evidence to warrant to serious research.
It is a terrible crime to destroy any evidence of our past considering it is so fractured and so little evidence is available to work from, I'm fairly confident that a whole epoch of human history is being covered up deliberately and for no good reason. Yes it would put the academic world into turmoil however surely that is small price to pay for understanding our true history? Hopefully the case against the Smithsonian will encourage more scientists to come forward and demand this subject is research properly and maybe one day we'll see new exhibits documenting a previously unrecorded epoch of our history in museums around the world.
