But there is a catch that @dan completely ignores: finality of transactions is not a function of the blockchain like @dan wishes it to be, it is a function of the real-world entities that interact with the blockchain.
Could you explain what his finality concept means? As I understand it during a 51% attack when it is kept long enough, people will be "forced" to move to the longer chain.
RE: Dan Larimer Cannot Censor Accounts with 51% of Hashes