Superb summary, of the ongoing controversy. It's a very ideological topic, but i think the way this issue is addressed by article 15 is very productive. Given the many and low level requirements for an account to be considered to be active, i don't see that this article would have a broad scale impact on EOS token holders. 3 years is a long period of time for remaining inactive, and if there were a lot of similar cases, it might unnecessarily clutter the network.
RE: Why 'Article XV: Property Rights' is a great addition to the EOS constitution?