A couple weeks ago, @kennyskitchen let me know he’d contact @adamkokesh about setting up a debate with me, to be hosted by Kenny.

These guys are both very busy, but I sure would like to know whether the response was a yay or nay.

Here are three potential debate resolutions. I would be arguing the negative position in all three cases:

RESOLUTION: Becoming President via the American Electoral Process is a legitimate means by which to assume control and authority over lands and resources.

RESOLUTION: Centralized, redistribution of unowned property and resources by political mandate is compatible with the philosophy of Voluntaryism.

RESOLUTION: Running for and becoming POTUS is a legitimate means by which to acquire authority over other individuals.

If this debate is something you’d like to see on Dtube/Steemit, please upvote and resteem!

I’m itching to prove that the Kokesh 2020 presidential campaign platform is by definition, not a Voluntaryist platform, once and for all. Since it is by defintion not one my job would be easy, which may be why @adamkokesh won’t debate/hasn’t responded.

The run for president is fine. The fraudulent peddling of the plan as a Voluntaryist one is not. Get your own label! This one is already well-defined and well taken! It’s embarrassing to those of us who get it to have the Voluntaryist label plastered on authoritarian political initiatives.

~KafkA

!

Graham Smith is a Voluntaryist activist, creator, and peaceful parent residing in Niigata City, Japan. Graham runs the "Voluntary Japan" online initiative with a presence here on Steem, as well as DTube and Twitter. (Hit me up so I can stop talking about myself in the third person!)