#argumentation

By Insula Qui Socialism is dead. This can be contended and debated, but I would assert that socialism as a pure doctrine has been defeated. The original form of socialism is barely, if at all, relevant

In the last post we looked at the basics of Hans-Herman Hoppe's argumentation ethics (AE) and outlined the argument. Here, we'll look at some of the criticisms of the argument. Robert P. Murphy and Gene

David Hume famously argued that we cannot derive a moral ought from factual statements about what is.1 This distinction has dominated philosophical discourse regarding ethics ever since and proceeded to,

Geez, this person just continues to dig a hole. What arrogance... Doesn't this person realize I told them I would support them if they would step down from such a high horse for five seconds???🤣🤣🤣🤣😂

Life requires the use of scarce and rivalrous resources. Time, one’s physical body, and all the resources required to live – including food, water, and shelter – are all in limited quantity; and because

Ever have an argument with someone, and they say something so incredibly absurd that you're not sure if you heard it right? Something that makes you pause for a moment and return with: "Wait, what?"

In chess, the term ‘sharp’ is used to denote a move, position, game, or style of play that involves highly tactical positions in which there is the potential for great reward and little or no room for

Hello; The Georgia Freeman and ASA here to discuss faith. I like to start with definitions of what I am going to discuss: Faith: In the context of this discussion I am referring to Faith defined as: a

APPEAL to AUTHORITY .......... it is, entirely possible that the opinion of a person or institution of authority is wrong; therefore the authority that such a person or institution holds does not have