After a few minutes of searching for the wandering fugitive, Cain, I have come to the conclusion that Cain is based on the Elamite king Khallushu Insusinak.
Some experts will tell me that Cain is based on the story of Dumuzi (the pastor) and Enkidu (farmer) who fought to woo Inanna, but in this story Enkidu surrenders and in the bible Cain kills Abel.
If we analyze the Bible we see that Cain and Eve are not mentioned in chapter 5 of Adam's genealogy, so I think that the texts of chapters 1 and 5 were written first and then the texts of chapters 2, 3 and 4 were written (approximately between 600-500ac) and by 400ac when they join the texts of the kingdoms of Israel and Yahuda to form the TORAH the explanation of the name of SET was added as a substitute for Abel.
I will try to tell a story that begins when those from Israel were deported, mixed with other peoples so that they could not organize and rebel.
Once upon a time, about 2742 years ago, a king of the country of the sea, called Merodac Baladan (let's call him MERODAC), who entered Babylon (from now on referred to as BABEL) with support from ELAM (ATAMTI in late Elamita) and seized of BABEL, taking it from the Assyrians. Then, in 710 BC, Sargon II went to recover the city, unfortunately the Elamites did not help MERODAC in this confrontation, so he fled to take refuge in the country of the sea.
Then, in 703 BC, MERODAC invades BABEL again and defeats Marduk-Zakir-Suma II, who just a month earlier had expelled the Assyrians of Babylon, becoming king of BABEL once again. Sennacherib faced MERODAC, who was supported by SHUTRUKNAKHKHUNTE II, however Sennacherib defeated both of them and imposed Bel-ibni as king. Again Merodac had to take refuge in the country of the sea.
In 700 Merodac and Sennacherib met again, but this time Merodac escaped to take refuge in ELAM. Sennacherib put his son to rule BABEL. For the defeat of SHUTRUKNAKHKHUNTE II in ELAM there was a revolt where KHALLUSHU INSUSINAK became king.
In 694 Sennacherib invaded and sacked several Elamite cities in search of the fugitive Merodac, because of this, the Elamite king KHALLUSHU INSUSINAK invaded BABEL and kidnapped the son of Sennacherib, ASSUR-NADIN-SHUMI, KING OF BABEL, taking him to SUSA where they killed him .
Sennacherib blamed the Babylonian guards for the death of his son.
In 693ac Sennacherib faced the Elamites by defeating them, and the Elamites, for this defeat, expelled KHALLUSHU INSUSINAK by naming their elder brother KURDUR NAKHKHUNTE king.
Finally Sennacherib marched against BABEL, plundering the city, destroying the buildings, including the ziggurat ETEMENANKI (of this ziggurat, along with the deportations, were based on the myth of the tower of BABEL), its inhabitants were massacred, deported and sold as slaves.
So, according to my interpretation, when the biblical writers learned about this story they joined the fugitive MERODAC with KHALLUSHU INSUSINAK to do CAÍN, they also joined the brother of KHALLUSHU, SHUTRUKNAKHKHUNTE II with ASSUR-NADIN-SHUMI king of Babylon for ABEL.
Reference is made to the GUARDS when CAÍN says to God "I am perhaps my brother's GUARDIAN."
Other clues that lead me to say that CAÍN is King KHALLUSHU INSUSINAK are that ADAM supposedly created 6000 years ago, as the genealogies add up, represents ELAM (ATAMTI in late Elamita) who is a town of 6000 years ago and the wife of CAÍN , mentioned in the Jubilee book, called AWAN has the same name as the first known ELAM dynasty called AWAN.
As for EVA (HAWA) I think it represents the Persians who, when the Achaemenid dynasty settles in SUSA (540 BC when Cyrus the Great conquers Elam), SUSA was called AHWAZ, juggling this word form HAWA, the NAHASH snake would be Sumeria and its descendants would be Assyria and BABEL, also the city SUSA would be the city of ENOK because it was founded in approximately 3900 BC for the god INSUSINAK being INAK juggling to form ENOK, in the genealogy of Adam the seventh is ENOK and this it is based on the seventh antediluvian king ENMEDURANKI, but I think this one for the elamites was INSUSINAK.
Maybe some believe that what I am commenting is only pareidolia, confirmation bias, observer bias, etc., so if you have information that shows that I am wrong, send it to my email cronistaanonimo@outlook.com
If you have information that confirms my suspicions too.