I have a great amount of respect for people who work at one profession for a substantial amount of time. There are some things about certain professions it takes years and years to learn, sometimes even decades or more to really have a grasp on what is going on. So when I hear someone speak who has 30 years of experience and all the knowledge that comes with those 30 years of experience, I listen and trust what they have to say regarding that business.
Recently I had a chance to hear an interview of one such person, her name is Rebekah Roth, and what she had to say in that interview was really interesting. Rebekah spent thirty years of her life up in the air attending to the needs of passengers on commercial airline flights as a flight attendant. If you are like me, we have flown our fair share, but we really don’t know what all the work of a flight attendant entails. So listening to her interview and how she was able to communicate very specific interesting details of that work made for an enlightening time for me.
The broader subject that was being discussed I was already pretty familiar with, but I had never heard anyone address the subject from a flight attendant’s perspective. She was able to break down certain situations that come up during the course of a flight attendant’s job duties and what the protocol is for those situations. She also shared some insider knowledge into the jet planes and the equipment those plains have that I wasn’t aware of and you probably aren’t aware of either.
I had always known that the official language of the skies is English, did you know that? That’s right; all air line pilots are required to speak fluent English because all communication between the air traffic controllers who manage the travel of the planes and the pilots is in English. The reason I knew this is that I have a brother in law who was an air traffic controller for right at twenty years, he retired back around 2009. He worked up in Ohio at the FAA regional control center in Oberlin, Ohio and he was actually working on 9/11/2001 when the decision was made to ground all airplanes at the nearest airport to where the plane was located at the time the decision was made.
It just so happens that Rebekah Roth’s interview had to do with 911, as the events of that September 11th have been come to be known as. She wasn’t flying that day as she says in the interview which allowed her to watch the events occur as it unfolded. She said that as things were unfolding she saw things that were just “not right”.
The first thing she brings up in the interview is that no fighter jets were “scrambled” to intercept or least engage these hijack airliners. The normal response time to send jets to investigate is six minutes, it took nearly an hour and half before the jets were summoned. Next she brings up how a BBC article from 9/23/2001 said that the Saudi government was threatening to file suit against the US for claiming that six Saudi nationals were among the supposed 19 hijackers. The reason the Saudi’s were so upset was that the six the US was claiming to be hijackers were still alive and living in Saudi Arabia.
In 2004 Rebekah retired from being a flight attendant and then devoted thousands of hours to investigate the happening of 9/11/2001. She used her 30 years of flying experience to look at all the reports and coverage of 911 to see what other discrepancies might show up with what supposedly took place that day.
The interview I listened to was right at an hour long and she makes some very good observations that a person like me, with no internal working knowledge of the industry, would probably never pick up on and there is a good chance you wouldn’t either. She elaborates on what is “universal protocols” that every airline uses in the event of a hijacking and how those protocols weren’t used. Also she digs really deep into the phone calls that were supposed to have been made from these hijacked flights and all the problems that those calls bring to light if you know what you are listening too and what to listen for.
One thing of particular note is that it seems each plane managed to get two phone calls out during the time they were hijacked but before they ended up being crashed. Most of the calls were made by flight attendants, but according to Rebekah, the descriptions of what was taking place on the plane didn’t match, even though the two flight attendants were on the same flights.
We all know that in a lot of instances eye witnesses aren’t the best at recalling events after time goes by, but this is real time event recall not months or years later. One flight attendant says no one has been stabbed, the other one from the same flight says a passenger has been stabbed and gives the passenger’s seat location.
The other big fly in the ointment is that there is no background noise on these calls, no jet engine noise yet where the flight attendant supposedly is there is a jet engine in close proximity and flight attendants have trouble conversing in the area without having to elevate their voices in order to hear each other with clarity.
She also brings up something known in the industry as the “flight termination system”, it is an add on to the planes computer system that in the event of a hijacking and when hijackers have breached the cockpit, the controls in the cockpit are overrode by the system and the plane is then controlled by people on the ground who manage the system. They can then fly the plane remotely and land it where ever they determine best to land the plane. This system was available at the time of 911 and she believes it was used. The system isn’t standard equipment on Boeing aircraft but is compatible with the planes that were involved on 911. I had no idea that this is available and was back then, but it makes perfect sense, and we see drones now in use all the time both commercially and in the military with similar controls systems.
The other interesting thing about the flight termination system is that once it is activated the planes transponder that is used to track the plane by ground radar is rendered useless, as is all the radio communications devices on the plane. The only thing that has control of the plane is the person on the ground working the flight termination program. She pieces together that the planes more than likely were never hijacked but were taken over by the system and landed at a remote location.
I won’t give a complete recap of her interview here and now, I will give you a link and you can listen to it yourself if you are inclined too. I will tell you this much, if you have never given much thought to 911 and what took place that day and you are happy with the story that the media and the government has told you about it, don’t click the link.
If you have unanswered questions or doubts about the story as it has been told to us then by all means give it a listen. The group called “Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth” was the first group that I had come across that was raising “issues” with the official government report on 911 and that got me started paying attention and questioning things that just don’t seem right. Listening to Rebekah’s interview will also have that same effect on you, if you are open minded and willing to listen to an expert with over 30 years of experience.
I had laid off of the 911 stuff for a while, but I can tell you that if there ever was a false flag event, as these type things are referred too, 911 is it. I found this as I was looking for something else and the recent airline emergency that happened a couple days ago where the engine exploded and ended up killing at least one passenger was more than likely just an accident.
In my opinion, and several other highly qualified individuals that have degrees and have years and decades of experience in their field of expertise, we think that 911 was no hijacking pulled off by 19 Jihadist terrorists.
To use an old saying, “the cat is out of the bag”. Whether or not you want to acknowledge it that is your personal choice. I just hope that if don’t acknowledge it; that same cat doesn’t come back to bite you on your butt at some point in the future. The more they do and get away with, the more they are inclined to do.
Until next time,
@sultnpapper
The video link is from YouTube account holder listed on the video and is their property not @sultnpapper property.
