Hi, if I got you correctly, you answer that it is justified to create inconveniences to the public while fighting for a cause. My question is based on your experience in 2014. You spoke about how it affected your economy( the outcome of that event) so my question is, was the aim achieved? If not then why would you carry on a cause that won't yield any result?
I believe there are many ways to fight for a cause and it is best to go with the option that doesn't affect the general public and most especially, will yield a positive result afterward.
I enjoyed reading your post though.
#Dreemport led me here