The occasion of this post is to lock evidence into time proving that I am a national and not a U.S. citizen in accordance with 8 USC § 1101 (a)(22)(B). I am also now a foreign diplomat for the Nation of the Amnesty Coalition. The way this is accomplished is through the definition of naturalization. See: 8 USC 1101 (a)(23).
Details on how I did the above are in the section below labeled “Explanatory Statement - Annexed to DS-11” and is an exact copy of the original document sent to the U.S. Department of State redacting only my address and Covenant of the Amnesty Coalition statement which is edited occasionally. It was sent back to me, apparently without recording in the original passport documents (evidence exclusion). The first FOIA for certified copy of my passport documents does not include the DS-11 explanatory statement that I originally sent on June 7th, 2024.
While it appears that so far the Internal Revenue Service is following the law correctly, the U.S. Department of State appears to have excluded evidence of my “national and not a US citizen” status. I say “appears to” because I have not yet heard back from FOIA appeals as to how they did record it. The FOIA request with the U.S. Dept of State (should be requirement) has not proven satisfactory as to how they actually recorded my status, and with the wheels falling off the wagon of state, I think there’s a need to record accurately what is happening before potential miscreants in government bury the truth.
The passport form has a section on parents and their citizen status with a checkbox that says “US citizen”. Most people mistakenly think that this is asking if your parents are “US citizens”. That is not what it says though. Assumptions are dangerous. It doesn’t say on the form “is this person a US citizen?” It’s just says “US citizen”. It is in fact a “naturalization” box. By checking yes or no, you are either conferring citizenship status or not upon your parents. If you use the “US manual of Styles”, you can also specify whether you are referring to their ens-legis (if you don’t know what that is, look it up in Blacks Law Dictionary - recommend 4th edition) or their human name.
I believe that the reason why they don’t have that same checkbox for the applicant is because the U.S. Department of State wants to naturalize you where they want you to be without showing on future potential FOIA’s of your US passport form that you naturalized yourself as a non-citizen national of the United States of America. So they sent back my DS-11 explanatory statement, pretend they never saw it, and record what they want me to be. Then if I make the mistake of not rebutting the statement, it can stand as truth in law.
The reason why they have to do it this way is because the 13th amendment says that involuntary servitude is illegal. It is illegal to force a contract. So what they do is trick you into volunteering using your incorrect but very reasonable assumptions about the terms they are using (violating the transparency precept in contract law). If you don’t understand the definitions of their words, terms and phrases, you will be tricked into signing incorrectly. This is intentional.
First mistaken assumption is what the “United States” is. See 28 USC § 3002 (15)(a).
Second mistaken assumption is where the “United States” is. See UCC article 9 § 307(h).
Third mistaken assumption is that “State of New York”, “United States”, etc are located under your feet or that you are somehow a resident because that is the ground you are standing on. See 4 USC § 72.
As corporations, these “States” (note capitalization) are sub-corporations and therefore located in the District of Colombia. I suspect that the only way you can reside in any of these is by “naturalization” because they are ideas located in file cabinets.
The real “under your feet” authority is governed by land patents which your governments generally do not own (they trick you into using lot numbers instead of “meets and bounds” to define the land so that they can insert themselves as having a security interest in your property). God created the land, so technically governments aren’t usually “owners”.
You are not tied into government because of where you are, but because of what contracts you’ve signed. This is why your government can track you globally because contracts are global through the UCC. It matters not what location you are in (also nationality has nothing to do with location, but is an artifact of allegiance).
What’s the proof? Does the “Sovereign Order of Malta” own land? They are a nation though, but rent land in Spain. Where is the Nation of the League of Women’s Issues located? Where is the Iroquois Nation located? Where was the Nation of Israel located prior to 1947? Nationality and citizenship have nothing to do with where you are.
I started discovering parts of this more than a decade ago, but didn’t take it seriously. In 2011, I met Mika otf Rasila on FB who instructed me on parts of this, but didn’t feel like I could take action. Then I started interacting with White Walking Feather (both from Turtle Island – aka Canada) around 2018. They are both sovereign nationals from Canada. I read quite a bit from judge Anna von Reitz’s web page around 2012, but didn’t follow through with anything.
It wasn’t until Cahlen Lee of cahlen.org mentioned to me what Brandon Joe Williams was doing and that he had a “Contract Killer Course” that I started taking this info seriously. I started his course on July 15th, 2023 and fell into an obsession with studying law. I am now in an online Juris Doctorate program. I won’t take the bar exam unless I can find a way not to domicile in the District of Colombia. See 36 USC § 70501.
Interesting side note about 36 USC § 70501, it’s the only place where I’ve seen anybody able to “domicile” in the District of Colombia (usually everyone is just a resident). So only “bar-card holders” can domicile in DC. What does that suggest? Where is the Bar Association from? Are they referring to the London Bar? Is king George snickering in his grave about finally winning the revolutionary war of 1776 with the Organic Act of 1871?
I finally felt like I understood well enough what was going on and started the process of killing those contracts that violated two precepts of contract law (lack of consideration and lack of transparency). My first step was on May 6th, 2024 with my notarized durable power of attorney over my ens-legis (the all caps name that represents my corporation formed from my birth certificate). On June 7th, 2024, I applied for a US passport using the rules as defined in Brandon’s 1.0 course:
https://onestupidfuck.com/contractkillercourse
I also revoked my voter registration on August 8th. The office clerks in Oswego seemed to pretend not to understand what I was requiring them to do and sent me a form with more trickery. My response to that is here:
https://astrology-x-files.com/rvra.txt
Because of the depth of the deception, it will take time to clean up the remaining contracts that have built up over my 60+ years. I have set precedent so far as to my intentions here. For those who might want to do the same, know that it is an international human rights violation for your government to prohibit the following (from article 15 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights):
I started this process because I understood that through international NGO’s the people of the world are being attacked in order to subjugate them into what the World Economic Forum calls the “Great Reset”.
The pLandemic was launched in late 2019 in an attempt to create fear using a bioweapon created in various level 4 bio-labs around the world (Wuhan, China, Chapel Hill, NC, Ukraine, etc). The goal being to reshape society and strip freedom from all citizens of the world in order to force everyone into 15 minute cities (really concentration camps).
While proof of the above isn’t fully established in legal action yet, the WEF made the mistake of openly admitting to their plans. Dr David Martin has proof in the patents recorded at the US Patent Office which he says are documented crimes. I expect a 2nd Nuremberg trial to sort out “crimes against humanity” starting sometime by next summer.
Date: 6/3/24
By: Manwaring, Curtis Roland/agent
For: CURTIS ROLAND MANWARING/Principal
Address: (REDACTED)
SECTION 1
Hello!
If my passport card is printed with my “legal name,” I realize that name signifies a “public corporation,” which is defined as the following:
“A public corporation is one created by the state for political purposes and to act as an agency in the administration of civil government.” -Black’s Law 4th Edition
This corporation is generally identified as one of the following 3 variations:
• CURTIS ROLAND MANWARING
• CURTIS R MANWARING
• CURTIS MANWARING
There is a fourth variation of the above name which is a miss-spelling of my middle name on the shortened version of the birth certificate (not the COLB which is correct) that is as follows:
• CURTIS ROULAND MANWARING
This variation of the spelling will no longer be used in the future. Unfortunately, I only discovered this recently so there's more than 62 years of history with the above miss-spelled "ROULAND" in my documents.
Also, my drivers license still reflects my past misunderstanding of citizenship having naturalized into a jurisdiction that is foreign to me, so please do not construe it as an indication of "US citizenship". This would be incorrect and you will see why below. I plan to have my drivers license destroyed once I have the passport since I am not involved in commercial activity (transport for hire) and it implies incorrectly what jurisdiction I am in.
I want to thank you for allowing me to have a corporation, of which I can use in commerce, that gives me limited liability. I will be signing as the agent on behalf of the principal. I will not attach my Durable Power of Attorney to this statement, but if you would like a copy of it then please write to me and I’ll be more than happy to send you an original wet-ink copy.
In accordance with how the United States is defined in 28 USC 3002(15) and described in UCC 9-307(h), I, as the agent, do not reside or domicile in the United States. Myself, as the agent, am not a citizen of the United States, nor a US citizen, nor a U.S. person. Myself, as the agent, am not a 14th Amendment (federal) citizen. I have at least one point on 8 USC 1408 that applies to me and I have been a national, but not a citizen, since birth. I did not realize this until later in my life and I apologize for my lack of study and focus in this subject to truly understand the situation.
I invoke the power of the 9th Amendment to make clear that absolutely anything I am doing, have done or will ever do that does not harm or swindle others will be an absolute right that I confer upon myself.
I have selected a specific type of passport and endorsement code using the top right of the DS-11. That section is inside the area that I am clearly supposed to fill out. If there is absolutely any issues with issuing that type and endorsement of passport, I will request that you have all the exact and very specific relevant laws and statutes from the Foreign Affairs Manual available for me to read so I can understand all of the relevant rules associated with that and also exact and specific handlings needed to get that type and endorsement issued to myself or my ens legis.
I am conferring nationality of a state upon myself, after birth, by any means whatsoever through the process of naturalization, as per 8 USC 1101(a)(23) in order to have the status of “non-citizen national of the United States” as per 8 USC 1101(a)(22)(B). I will attach a certificate of live birth to prove that I have, in fact, been born. As a “national of the United States”,” as per 8 USC 1101(a)(22), I am only and exclusively a “(B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States.”
I am well aware of 22 CFR 51.2: “(a) A passport may be issued only to a U.S. national.” - my status as a U.S. national is only and exclusively “(B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States.”
I, nor my nation, waive any jurisdictional immunity granted to myself or my foreign state, such as that mentioned in 28 USC 1605(a)(1) and no ambassador of The Amnesty Coalition has the ability to waive or approve anything that would affect The Amnesty Coalition as a whole. That can only be done by Brandon Joe Williams, himself, the king of the Nation of the Amnesty Coalition.
I am a non-citizen foreign national and Ambassador-At-Large on behalf of the Nation of the Amnesty Coalition. I am conferring these statuses and nationalities upon myself, as the agent, without any request for permission or approval from the Dept of State or any other agency. My identity has already entirely integrated these statuses and positions. I am simply informing the Dept of State of that which is already decided and completed.
The subject of 22 USC 212 needs to be addressed as well: “No passport shall be granted or issued to or verified for any other persons than those owing allegiance, whether citizens or not, to the United States.”
To clarify what is meant by “allegiance,” I will defer to Black’s Law 2nd Edition definition: “By allegiance is meant the obligation of fidelity and obedience which the individual owes to the government under which he lives or to his sovereign in return for the protection he receives. It may be an absolute and permanent obligation or it may be a qualified and temporary one.”
To be clear, I am not an enemy of the incorporated entity that calls itself “United States.” But since I do not live in that area, nor do I have much in the way of contractual obligations with that area, my allegiance lies simply in the ideas that are found within that incorporated body that would match up with the definitions of “nation” and “peace” from the definitions section in section 2. My allegiance is not infinite and unconditional, my allegiance is confined to be within the definitions of “nation” and “peace” and, if the Federal corporation decides at any point to step outside of those definitions then my allegiance would end at that point. By definition, if the Federal corporation ever steps outside the definition of “nation” or “peace” then, by its own Codes, it ceases to exist. My allegiance ends at the moment that the nation ceases to exist simply because my support cannot exist for a nation that does not physically exist.
My true and unfettered allegiance lies in the ideas and spirit behind the idea of being a true American: freedom, common law, masculine and feminine duality, supreme force, technical performance, national pride, etc. My love and devotion to the heart and soul of our collection of independent unincorporated states is unquestionable and barely conditional. My allegiance ultimately lies in the unincorporated state in which I domicile, but that love does truly extend to all the other unincorporated states found within our union that intend and factually produce tranquility inside and outside of their nation and carry themselves as a unified body that operates with morals and decorum.
Just like the oath of office of the senate: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” But that specific Constitution is only and exclusively the original one that belongs to the unincorporated United States. The incorporated “United States” is foreign to me but the unincorporated “United States” is domestic to me.
As I study the diplomatic aspects of the passport system, it appears to have a strong connotation of commercial activity. Because my diplomatic activities are entirely non-commercial in nature, I will be requesting simply a “state citizen” or non-citizen national passport rather than a special issue passport.
I do not own a commercial or “for hire” motor vehicle, but plan to create custom plates from the internet using a private motor carrier DOT number in the future. Any car I will own in the future will not be used for commerce so, as per Federal/State Code, they are classified as “automobiles,” “private use” vehicles, etc, not motor vehicles.
I have looked into the copyright and trademark of the Dept of State seal and have determined that the seal is not explicitly unavailable for private individuals to use. I will be printing and using diplomatic plates that are entirely outside the purview of commercial activity and I would like to be transparent in my appreciation for your making available a type of plate that protects and identifies me as a legal foreign government as per 18 USC 11 and also an internationally protected person pursuant to 18 USC 112. I will not be selling or engaging in any type of commercial transactions using the seal, as I know that would be a violation of trademark laws regarding the seal.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
(Special Note: The above paragraph is actually incorrect as I found out about 3 months ago there is law (Public Law 91-651, Title 18 of the United States Code) banning use without written permission. I contacted Brandon about this when I discovered it and designed a new logo using the Nation of the Amnesty Coalition graphic to be used with our plates instead.)
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
(Continuing...)
I am excited to say that I will be at peace and foster peace between the Nation of The Amnesty Coalition and the United States at all times as per 18 USC 11. I wish to retain my “foreign government” status at all times and I find this to be of the utmost importance. Our definition and explanation of what is meant by “be at peace” will be described in section 2 of this statement.
Section 2 will now be all the information that may be of interest to the Dept of State and Dept of the Interior as regards to this nation.
Thank you very much for your assistance.
I also appended the covenant of an Ambassador of the Nation of the Amnesty Coalition to the DS-11 explanatory statement. It has since changed because Brandon edited it to include issues regarding the 14th amendment which is at the center of the issues of corruption currently happening in the USA (the 90th congress never legally ratified it, so it operates under color of law). You can see the most current covenant statement here:
https://www.theamnestycoalition.org/covenant-of-an-ambassador
By: Curtis Roland Manwaring, attorney-in-fact (Nov 3, 2024)