I observe and see medics speaking and writing experiences, studies, not many but i do, many of them are listed here on hive through 3rd party interviews or transcripts / quotes. I agree that you can reprove of medical information that can cause death instead of healing specially if it's "mandated" (which is what the journalists, activists, etc, are actually doing) through downvotes, but it would be more efficient to debate i think. What good does it do if "you" are not standing up for the reasoning. It goes to waste, time, resources, reputation, etc.

Also i was making a point and trying to confirm, the curators also loose the rewards right ? So it's a multi loss. Heck, speaking of delegated power, if the author is delegating to the account downvoting his own post wouldn't that be self destruction ? What a matrix. It is what it is for now, fluctuating alot and unpredictable most of the times.

PS: I heard fauci and gates were around in the AIDS epidemic :P

!gif matrix