Bali, known in January, came roaming around, but together brought a doubt - the camera is now outdated, it is new. Now it is not the first time that people used to wander the same thing for many centuries, the grandson of grandfather's old age was falling away till his old age. Nowadays people have become daredevil, adventurous, etc.;
The phone gets bored in one year, two years from the job, four years in the car and 10 years from the wife (please do not be offered with ration and water). In the 5-10-15 years, the government changes, depending on which area you live in. We have been eroding our camera for 7 years, now the time for change has come, the winds have started!
Since then it has taken panasonic, since then there has been a lot of attachment to it. Although this model is now closed, but a similar camera Panasonic did not make it again. It was not just a spectacular camera of its time, even today it is no match for experimentation.
So now I had a better camera than this, I did not want to have a prosumer or bridge camera again. He had to take the camera with an inter-changable lens and duck. It can be understood that this hiatus would have come first but I went on the date on the date and kept myself in the ninth place. The question of curious will be questioned, why?
The reason was a very straightforward one; There are two types of cameras in the world of inter-chain lens - with the mirror and without a mirror - my leaning was on the mirror, but until some time ago their quality was not that they would have to go home. Now the eager person would want to know what these two creatures are.
In fact, in cameras with inter-chain lens, people often know the same type of camera - SLR camera i.e. single lens reflex camera. No 65 years ago, an Italian company named Rectaflex had removed a new type of camera,
SLR with a focal plane shutter in which the lenses could be changed and which was painted with a pistachrum so that the eyes could be seen in front of the eyes rather than looking at the direction from top to bottom (as seen in today's cameras Are). Going into more technical information, this technique is seen in a slightly simpler tone.
SLRs with paintprizers work in such a way: through the lens, the light goes inside the camera and falls on a mirror located behind the lens, by reflecting that mirror, the light leads upward, where a five angle There is a pentamirror that turns the light twice and exits through a viewfinder.
So when you look in the viewfinder of a normal SLR camera, you see the image similarly. And when the shutter button is pressed then the mirror behind the lens gets up and instead of moving into the light viewfinder, the film falls on the image on which the image is printed. It is roughly the same functionality of a normal SLR camera.
So 65 years ago when such a camera came, this technique was very revolutionary and in a short time the technique became common, the SLR cameras started becoming similar. From that time there were forty years later in the 1990s- Two Kodak, Pentax, Minolta, etc. were sunset, Nikon and Canon were the only two SLR masters flags Were standing up.
When the time came of digital cameras, they made small digital cameras, but in place of something new to replace the aging PentPrism SLR technology, they digitized the same old technology, i.e. the digital sensor replaced instead of the film. And the old garbage was recycled. And for the last 15-20 years these two great digital SLRs are being eroded.
Although Nikon and Canon were engaged in selling this aging technique, there was no need for this technique in the digital era. Instead of reflecting the light coming out of the lens, instead of reflecting it by the mirror, let it go directly to the sensor and then from there, a digital image is shown on an electronic viewfinder, that should be the digital technology and with this technology the cameras are made of mirror less The camera is called.
With the cameras coming out of the mirror, etc., the cameras were lightened, leaving them smaller in size. Another advantage also happened that the lens of these cameras became too light, there was no need for excessive weight of SLR lenses with Pentaprism.
Crying paintprisms cry and cry out the quality of the optical viewfinder of SLR and keep an eye on the electronic viewfinder, but in my eyes, these people are just people who are afraid of change. The electronic viewfinder has developed quite well and has many advantages over the optical viewfinder.
