Recently, in the blockchain and cryptocurrency topic there is one burning topic, namely, the regulation of the ICO market. At the same time, enthusiasts from the world of cryptocurrency were divided into 2 camps. The former support any methods of state regulation (including SEC and AML methods). Others say that we can handle it ourselves. Like, we have everything for this - both smart contracts and decentralization.
The creator of Ethereum, Vitaly Buterin, is also more inclined to the second side, and even put forward the concept of DAICO, where it was clearly stated how using smart contracts you can make project teams work in the interests of investors.
However, the world does not stand still, and DAICO has much to evolve. Let's look carefully today at the project, which proposes the next transformation of the current unsafe and, at times , lost trust, ICO into a new generation of ICO.E - investment projects that will be completely transparent.
Eqwity is a decentralized platform on the blockchain, which offers a completely new approach to investment projects (ICO.E), which is characterized by absolute transparency and trust from investors. In addition, after fees at ICO.E, the project remains regulated by investors in the full sense of the word. So how exactly do they direct the company and make decisions.
Of course, my attentive reader will immediately ask himself a question, but what is the difference between Eqwity from other similar projects? I’ll say one thing right away - these other projects are similar to each other, and Eqwity, apart from the idea itself, has a completely different concept from them. And about her we will speak further.
To fully understand the depth of the Eqwity concept, I propose to recall the existing problems that alienate the potential investor from the ICO market today.
Of course, the first and main problem has a capacious English name "scam". In other words, the majority of ICO projects today are completely fraudulent projects that do not set themselves any other purpose than to raise funds and then "dissolve" with this collected money.
The second problem is the lack of rights of investors. In fact, they help the project to start, and he, in response, promises them only ephemeral golden mountains and a flight to the moon to the value of their tokens. And the investor wants to get both the right to vote and the right to make decisions at key points in the development of the project. The same applies to the company's shares and subsequent dividends.
Further, we can note the high rate of fall of newly launched projects. This is characterized by the exchange value of their tokens only at best. Since most of the projects turn out to be "dead" from the very beginning, they have not gone to the stock exchange, and therefore depriving themselves of the opportunity to receive funds for further development of the project.
You can also note the lack of any qualifications among project teams. Having a good idea and customized WhitePaper, many ICO projects experience enormous difficulties when entering the real market conditions. All this is explained by the elementary lack of necessary professional skills, resistance to stress, and the adoption of wrong decisions.
It cannot be ruled out that such teams can simply steal the funds collected from such teams. Hired programmers, attracted by the "buzzword" CEO - all these are risk factors that can simply leave the team without the money raised.
And who are the founders? Pictures on LinkedIn with possibly reliable information about yourself? In reality, it is physically impossible to check who is behind the creation of this or that project. People from LinkedIn, who are ready to publicly present the project, can also be attracted for money, while remaining in the shadows.
Naturally, the prevailing conditions cannot be called positive. And this, in particular, is understood by the governments of many countries, in one way or another limiting the activities of the ICO. Intervention officials often are disastrous for beginners and inexperienced companies. They are simply not ready for such pressure.
It would seem that the "sinking" of the company could save the secondary market, which is not currently there. And it is quite possible that all the developments that are, could be implemented with the help of another team. But this option is simply not available.
It should be noted that this is still not all the problems, but probably the most obvious of those that are present in the ICO market today.
The entire ecosystem of the Eqwity platform is divided into 4 full sections. At the same time, their implementation depends directly on the fees for the ICO project - the more they will be, the more sections will be implemented. But let's talk about everything.
ICO.E platform
Section 1: ICO.E platform - full transparency of investments and bilateral interest of project founders and investors .
The main element of ICO.E is a bilateral interest in everything: investment, transparency, trust, financial stability to market changes, project viability rating (PoV). For these purposes several basic approaches will be used:
Community voice
Section 2: community voice is a decentralized Internet platform for managing a company by the community and investors .
In essence, the basis for decentralized management of a company is the direct opportunity for investors to directly participate in decisions made by a company at different stages of its activity. The Eqwity platform provides several tools for this:
Cryptocurrency blockchain exchange
Section 3: the blockchain cryptocurrency exchange is a decentralized exchange created for trading in utility tokens of projects attracted by Eqwity, including in the secondary market .
Eqwity is globally approaching the creation of a new exchange where investors will be able to trade their assets. For example, they introduce 2 new indexes for the stock market - BSE30 and BSE500. The top 30 companies by capitalization will fall into BSE30, the remaining 500, respectively, will receive the second largest index. In addition, Eqwity has the following objectives, creating its own stock exchange:
Teaching teams and project support
Section 4: a special environment for the incubation and preparation of blockchain companies for subsequent entry into the market .
Eqwity is planning to create a kind of business incubator in London that can eliminate one of the main problems of the blockchain companies - their readiness for market realities. To do this, also come up with several effective tools:
Unfortunately, I repeat once again that not all of these stages will be implemented if the Eqwity project does not assemble the Hard Cap. Well, it's time to smoothly move on to the ICO project and voice all the conditions necessary to translate such ambitious and undoubtedly necessary plans into life.
So, the Eqwity platform token will be EQY . Total will be released 6 billion and 250 million tokens. Approximate price of 1 EQY will be 0.01 USD.
Now to the fun part. Remember what I said a couple paragraphs ago? So, Eqwity set 3 slats for fees. The first is a Soft Cap in the amount of 6 million USD. The second is a hard cap in the amount of 16 million USD. But there is also a third bar - Moon Cap in the amount of 30 million USD. And now take a look at this tablet:
Notice how the implementation plans differ with different amounts of funds raised. If Eqwity collects only Soft Cap, then we will see only the first stage of implementation (the first section). If Hard Cap is assembled, then we will see the second and third sections, but the second one will be without an AI and a smart helper. And only when collecting
Moon Cap, we will see the platform in full glory.
So, all 6 billion with a small token will be distributed as follows:
Attracted funds are planned to spend depending on the gradation of fees:
And even here, Eqwity shows a detailed study of the concept. If there is a gradation of fees - it should be reflected in the distribution of funds. Great that the moment is not missed. As well as a separate item of expenditure on listing project tokens.
Opinion about the project
You know, while I was preparing to write this article and carefully studied the WhitePaper project, I continually slipped the following thoughts: "oh, that’s definitely necessary" or "just a cool idea." I think you understand, I really like this project. If earlier, when faced with analogs and the concept of DAICO, all the time it seemed to me that here a couple of points were not finalized, then I don’t find flaws in Eqwity.
A great concept, the London location of the company itself, a professional team of real enthusiasts - all this brings pleasant thoughts about the good future of Eqwity.
At the same time, the ICOBench is worthless 3.9 points at the time of this writing. True, not a single expert has yet voted, so this assessment is far from final.
Much has been written about the need for companies that will regulate the ICO market. I will not repeat myself in this regard, but I’ll note that while Eqwity looks to me against their background preferable. Well, you choose, as always, to you.
WEBSITE: https://www.eqwity.io
TELEGRAM: https://t.me/Eqwity
WHITEPAPER: https://www.eqwity.io/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Eqwity_WhitePaper_ENG_1.0.pdf
ANN THREAD: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5048927.0
FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/Eqwity-925774120955061
TWITTER: https://twitter.com/eqwity_official
MEDIUM: https://medium.com/@eqwity.official
LINKEDIN: https://www.linkedin.com/company/eqwity/
YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEeKpSGEztyo9jFFa--SfKw
Author Profile:
Bitcointalk Username: CryptoMark777
BitcoinTalk Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2544290
Ethereum Address: 0x5775CDbfeF7411b4d4Da761c5C1F7d436d0Fd990