Sorry, but the Web 1, 2, 3 story is a false narrative.

The Internet in the 1990s was dominated by bulletin board services.

The primary funding for web development came from venture capital. This was problematic because charlatans created a huge number of web sites that did not have a long term use case.

The venture capital created a stock bubble that collapsed in the dot bust.

The dot bust led to a period of industry consolidation. This consolidation led to a centralization of the web.

The term "Web 2.0" was a brand created by a publisher to sell a series of conferences after the dot bust.

Since Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 really don't mean anything. The term Web 3.0 is simply a buzz word pushed by people trying to sell the public on coins of dubious value.

I was programming dynamic web sites back in the 1990s.

If you read the RFCs that defined the initial release of the internet is easy to prove that the Internet was a rich and dynamic media from day one.

Sadly the Web 1.0 2.0 3.0 narrative was something pushed by marketers who were selling people on coins of questionable quality.

Web 3.0 was a buzzword to sell a gullible public on FTT and other failed currency. Sadly this buzzword will be chocked up by historians as yet another example of marketing hype.

It is a false narrative.