much of what you describe is a little obscure

My apologies about that, I tried to link to as many things as I thought might need some explanation. But you are right, I should've given some background about some of what I was mentioning.
I even tried not to get into any technicalities about superdeterminism (which I might do later on in another article)

Thank you for that interesting read, I haven't seen it before. Yes indeed, it doesn't seem to be solvable, even though the theory (superdeterminism) agrees with all the data and offers a more "sensible" view of the world, but it isn't testable (or falsifiable) as I mentioned in the article.

Thank you so much for reading @agmoore, glad it sparked an interest and opened a new door to look into. 😊