Would you rather tell your deepest secrets to a Robot or a human, if both helped you feel better? Are you sure? Let's see.
Here are some of the advantages/disadvantages of PaulsRobot compared with human counsellors and also friends or family. Not everyone with a problem gets to talk to a trained counsellor about it. Usually one will first talk to family and friends, even though there are some things that one might hold back in a social situation that one would be willing to tell a professional counsellor.
PaulsRobot: Obviously the "human element" is missing, and more self-discipline is needed from the client to get and stay in session and just keep at it. Someone with relationship difficulties might benefit far more from the warmth, respect and openness of a live counsellor, impossible here
Human Counsellor: Varies, but human counsellors usually score well on empathy
Friends/Family: Varies, but usually one would only confide in sympathetic persons
PR: It seems to work well in a variety of situations, provided the client follows the instructions. This is completely contrary to expectation. It was even contrary to Paul's expectation when he was first experimenting with what became PaulsRobot
HC: Varies, depending on the quality of both the counsellor and the style of counselling they use
FF: Varies, but people untrained in a field tend to be less effective than professionals
PR: Free of charge
HC: Varies. Minimum wage is roughly £5 or €5 or $7 per hour, with some counsellors charging much more
FF: Free of charge
PR: 24/7. PaulsRobot is available whenever you want to schedule a session
HC: Online real-time counselling available worldwide, but usually with prior appointment. In-person counselling depends on local situation — more difficult in rural areas. Finding a local practitioner who is qualified to deliver whatever speciality you want is sometimes difficult
FF: Depends on what you want to say and how you say it
PR: None, of course. This is a pioneer field
HC: Varies. Many counsellors with normal counselling qualifications are members of the BACP (UK) or ACA (US)
FF: None
PR: None
HC: Professional counsellors who are members of the BACP or ACA carry liability insurance. Whether or not a client's own insurance company will pay for the counselling varies by company and policy
FF: None
PR: Invariable from client to client and session to session. As decent and ethical as a bot can be. Although no Robot counsellor can be a model of glowing acceptance toward the client, neither will there ever be the slightest hint of criticism or judgment of the client, whatever the client's demeanour or self-esteem
HC: Usually dependable
FF: Varies. An untrained counsellor might well be a very decent person, but be completely unaware of the right thing to do in a counselling situation
PR: Most PaulsRobot procedures are fresh 21st century developments. Other procedures that are designed to be Robot versions of "regular" ones (like Rogerian Therapy) are necessarily adjusted somewhat to fit into the Robot paradigm, although their character is intended to be essentially unchanged
HC: Varies. It depends on the practitioner, as to how strictly he adheres to what is usual. And it depends on how much room there is for individual variation built into the modality concerned
FF: No
PR: 100%
HC: Except in very rare cases, no contact at all
FF: No
PR: Shaky. There is nothing to stop the client walking out of the room
HC: Hands-on control possible when there in person. If it is a remote session, much harder but still more positive than an automated system (can try to persuade, count on social factors etc)
FF: Shaky. Someone untrained in counselling procedures might be very willing to help, but often would not know how to deal with a tricky situation
PR: 100%. You are in complete control of which response option to pick
HC: Depends on how well the counsellor understands what you say, and think, and feel in session
FF: Depends on how well the person understands what you say and think and feel
PR: Highly consistent, not subject to illness, mood swings, or other work and family distractions
HC:Varies from counsellor to counsellor
FF: Varies, but reliability as a friend does not necessarily translate over to reliability as a counsellor
PR: Minor to non-existent, as Robot is not a living being
HC: Varies with skill level (and cost) of counsellor, but more likely as counsellor is a living human being
FF: Varies, but someone untrained as a counsellor is far more likely to "get in the way" than a professional counsellor
PR: None. But PaulsRobot procedures are designed to not need biofeedback and its absence is not a lack
HC: The value of a biofeedback device depends on the skill level of the practitioner. An effective biofeedback device wielded by a real expert, who doesn't miss indications or misinterpret them, and who doesn't allow the client to have things falsely validated or suggested by biofeedback indications (or lack of them), can add significant value in a session
FF: Not applicable
PR: Depends if you tell anyone! Very few people would accept that Robot counselling is even possible, let alone beneficial
HC: If you are reading this, then your friends and associates are probably familiar with human practitioners of this type
FF: One would usually only "open up" to someone likely to be sympathetic
PR: No personal details at all are transmitted during Robot sessions, so no secrets can be revealed. This means that however embarrassing or even unlawful the client's topic is, no hint of it can possibly leak out except via the client herself
HC: Usually good, in line with professional codes of ethics. Note that it is mandatory for a professional counsellor to report some situations that the client reveals in session (threats of violence, child abuse, strong suicidal tendencies etc.) to appropriate authorities
FF: Risky
PR: You choose exactly what you want to address and when to do it. There are (at PaulsRobot3) five entire modules (Core, HeavyDuty, Morph, BasicR3X and Psycho) that can be used to address and discharge virtually any topic
HC: Depends on how skilled the practitioner is, and how effective the procedure(s) in use are at addressing your specific concerns
FF: Unlikely to happen with someone not counsellor-trained.
Source: Above text taken from my writings at PaulsRobot3.com and RubAndYawn.com.
Feel free to ask questions in the comments, and I'll do my best to answer them for you.
To get free online fully-personalized stress-release sessions 24/7, see the links below.
I am not a licensed practitioner in your area, and no longer give personal sessions. My works, designed for normal people and not clinical cases or the dysfunctional, treat you as a spiritual being and not mere flesh and blood. Use my free websites and videos at your own risk.
Table gives post number, title/link, brief notes about content.
Yawnguy YouTube videos: Entry level. Since 2007, I deliver sessions directly to you by video on your custom topics. Start with Rub & Yawn 1/3.
YawnMachine.com: Entry level. Mobile-friendly. Text-based Rub & Yawn sessions.
PaulsRobot.com: Entry level (more or less). Mobile-friendly. More options to address your own topics. Sessions use three different Rub & Yawn techniques (Reach & Withdraw, 6-Direction, Rogerian). Includes theory and explanations.
RubAndYawn.com: Entry-level. Mobile friendly. Theory/explanations only, no session delivery.
PaulsRobot3.com: Advanced level. Desktop site. Delivers sessions on your custom topics. 3375 session pages in 31 onsite modules, using over 16 different techniques, none of them simply “talking about it”. Includes all relevant theory.
PaulsRobot2.com: Advanced level. Mobile-friendly. Experimental. PaulsRobot functionality but through icons instead of words. Includes automated session record. Video intro.
Yawnguy.com: Entry level. Desktop site. Links to my other sites. Over 100 testimonials. Includes roll-your-own audio session templates.
Facebook: My FB account, not used much.
Twitter: I have @yawnguy, @paulsrobot, @rubandyawn accounts, now coming out of hibernation since 2009.
