morning
gitchu the numbers right away, are you serious about the #devs thing because it wouldnt require rocket science as long as you can get people to adhere to a certain format (or a number of formats ...)
for instance if you were to take a look here :
https://tyrnannoght.000webhostapp.com/bloglog.php , then click "repliestab" , you can see a list of few of my accounts (with even people who have active voting at @goldmanmorgan listed in a different colour than those who dont)
so ...
between my first and second cup-a-joe :
https://tyrnannoght.000webhostapp.com/tyrsubtabs/rpls.php
very fast adaptation of the original so im not sure it will take replies to replies but that wouldnt even be the point and in order to parse properly and make SURE you would need people to adhere to a minimum agreed-on "syntax" there (or format) b/c computers dont decide, they follow orders , but steem-chain would make this not very hard actually
now as for the numbers :p
#1
(Down-votes - proposals) <- easier if this werent here but no biggie
1:0
2:0
3:0 (can have remarks if whitespace between too even - id say 1 & 2 already make this unnecessary and if so simply even back to "downvotes cost resources would be damage control)
4:0
5:x (not sure what you mean here)
6:10 (thats karma, lol, buying off your sins by doing good doesnt make them right)
#2
(its a bit hard with the overlapping and i could probably easy pick ONE from each that has my preference over all the others, give that one a zero and the rest a 10 but wouldnt be right because most are acceptable to downright good proposals)
1:2 (im fine with 50/50 as a standard but payout should start from the absolute minimum 0.001 possible, not from and exact 0.02)
2:0 (best option , more choice more better)
3:1 (good but less options)
4:10 (no, smallfry and fat fish are both considered humans, choice should be free, not dictated by government)
... for instance that could be a potentially parse-able syntax ... if you plan on doing this a lot im certainly willing to give it a try but no promises or deadlines hehehh
awesomeness as always ...
the #4in the second (for instance if you adhere to strict syntax lines would need to begin with the hash so hashes after char1 would not trigger a "list detected" something like that ... lol) that's about some kind of positive discrimination and regulation, i think if you start dividing its already wrong, that fat fish NEEDS to make the choice him/herself, being forced to do it will create a-versity
much to be said about every single one (and probably a lot more than i do right now but its a poll so i'll spare some energy for the rest of the day) and its also possible (for me) to pick simply one that surpasses the rest in each of both lists, hence my choice might seem a bit close to bi-polarity there :D
but well, thanks much again for a fabulous example of an-Erica-nism :p
technically you wouldnt even need the whitespace between for the comments if all the numbers with the separator start at a newline because you could intval or whatever is used the second section but i dont wanna go there as you have defined yourself as a #normie ( = lmao) but i have a feeling ojou-sama overthere is a lot more of a normie than you are, Erika ... maybe gets the concept wrong or is trying to incite tribalism (which somewhat opposes the goal thats portraied as trying to achieve but lets not get into namecalling there's already enough enmity to go around) im on discord but only by demand lol, i got a telegram for my game i try to check daily but if you really wanna i wanna try writing a little parser it shouldnt be all too much rocket science (just dont mention my name unless in the small print if and when i do - i dont like the spotlight much :))
agh , well it's Yap Cat so why hold back euhm : part 4 of the second one i mean its ... i would say
free speech is absolutely free or it is absolutely not , in essence i would say (thats one of the other me's) : if you don't let them speak freely you'll never find out where the clowns and the idiots are and the dangerous extremists will hide in dark corners and speak anyway, its a bit like that : if that fat fish chooses to pick the whole cake for him/herself in public it will show in public - it's free choice, but like most weaponry ... even truth is a three edged sword as it damages the wielder who holds it as well as both parties its aimed at (or more) (and then some ...) with this ... im gonna try and catch up some of the replies ive been missing, see you around, if you're serious let me know i see what i can whip up
RE: THE USAGE OF (voting) BUTTONS: RELOAD?