Sorry it seems that this wasn't clear. Only the unopened starter packs will be non-transferrable. Once opened, the cards in them will be just normal cards like in any other type of pack that can be

because we don't get value from the spellbook - we get value from players sticking around Yes - this is exactly what I said when we were discussing this internally. It's much better to use the spellbook

Just checked my feed before bed and got roped into trying out snaps! Figured I could use it to start some Splinterlands speculation. Some things I’ve been working on lately are Conclave Arcana and Hardcore

I like your shirt!

I am very sorry about that...I just searched for you in Discord and saw that you did indeed message me about that. I guess I must have missed it. I turn off Discord notifications when I'm working and sometimes

Hey @ura-soul, great to hear from you! I am very sorry I missed your proposal. Please feel free to reach out to me directly in the future if something like that comes up, or anything else really. I know

No, I took over as CEO last year. Here is the announcement post about that for your reference:

I am very sorry that you got involved in this, or that there is even anything to get involved in. I responded to pharesim's post with a similar message that Aggroed does not speak for Splinterlands nor

I also do not like to get involved in whale voting games and Hive politics, and I just wanted to say that Aggroed does not speak for Splinterlands and certainly not for me. I don't want any part in what

While I am a huge fan of the Peakmonsters team and what they have done and continue to do for the ecosystem, I think it would be a big mistake for the DAO to move the development of the SPS validator system

yes - that too. The goal of this is to get more new players into the ecosystem, and reward current players for doing that. Not to give more rewards to existing players for no reason.

You can leave it up to the team to decide. I certainly understand your bias, and in an ideal world I would prefer to have it be backward-looking too, but the unfortunate reality is that I think it would

This is a really great proposal - well done @bulldog1205. It's well thought through and clear and makes sense. I definitely will support it. The only question I have is whether this is supposed to be

The in-game reserves account will only hold the tokens that have been bridged to external blockchains. The validator software should allow you to see the type of information you're asking for without having

It's a bit confusing regarding the total token supply. If 3 billion tokens are minted on BSC and there are already 200 million on ETH, doesn't this exceed the total of 3 billion? How do we ensure that

This is a good point, thank you!

It can work any way we want really. I would just prefer that the rewards be based on the cards used in the battle - not just cards sitting in your collection. So the math can be worked out to be the same

What if we just re-implemented the minimum card level limits in Wild format? It seems to me that this would achieve the same goal - i.e. limiting the rewards for accounts using low level cards in high

I think you're lying about these purchases. There's no way you can fit any more things in the shop...