RE: RE: Web3 vs Traditional Platforms
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Web3 vs Traditional Platforms

Words
176
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
2y

Most people do not would like to control the platform. They just would like to have a socially properly working platform.

Traditional social networks can certainly provide that.

Web 3.0, or at least Hive is different.

At least nowadays.

There is a general lack of real interaction, and also general lack of actual interest in the content.

Both as a content creator and as a content consumer, and the latter side is nowadays only a very little, tiny fraction.

Even the so called curators are often do not even see the content they curate, because their upvotes are automated.

On Web 3.0 (at least on Hive), nowadays most people focus on the rewards, instead of the content, and this is how they socially ruin the platform.

Nowadays even the smallest Facebook groups (for example with a few hundred members) have more interaction than the Hive blockchain in general.

And Hive is centralised around those, who have a high amount of stake. Most other posts are mostly ignored/overlooked.

The decentralisation on Hive nowadays is rather an illusion.