Geo-Engineering will save the planet!

Words
576
Reading
3 min
Listen
Play
4y


Geo-Engineering is fucking genious

Undo man-made changes by introducing even more man-made changes.

😹

like:
"turning the blue sky milky white or the blue oceans soupy green, by attenuating sunlight – and with it starlight, and by putting bureaucrats and technocrats in charge of a global thermostat"

grafik.png

We've screwed things up in accident. So sure, let's do worse but on purpose this time... 😏

oh I am pretty sure we can do that!

This is Fine!! 🔥🔥🔥

grafik.png

technocrat pulling the world’s weather levers, appeared on the cover of Collier's magazine May 28, 1954

https://soundcloud.com/djfauzia/progression-fauzia

Geoengineering is in fact untested and dangerous.
We don’t understand it, we can’t test it on smaller than planetary scales, and we don’t have the political capital, wisdom, or will to govern it.
Planetary tinkering is not “cheap”, as some economists claim, since the side effects are unknown…
Most poignantly, by turning the blue sky milky white or the blue oceans soupy green, by attenuating sunlight – and with it starlight, and by putting bureaucrats and technocrats in charge of a global thermostat, geoengineering will alter fundamental human relationships to nature.

~James Fleming

https://climate.nasa.gov/ask-nasa-climate/1065/nuking-the-sky/

from April 14, 2014

The planet is warming and our climate changing. As political leaders around the world fail to reach agreement on how to curb the greenhouse-gas emissions that are the underlying problem, others are touting a more radical way to combat climate change: "geoengineering." The idea behind geoengineering is to deliberately tinker with the climate system to counteract man-made climate change. Schemes suggested include making clouds and crops brighter so that they reflect more sunlight back out into space, using high-altitude balloons to inject aerosols into the stratosphere and cool the Earth, or sucking carbon dioxide out of the air so that it can't trap heat and contribute to global warming. In the absence of a planet B, hacking the planet is a possible plan B.

But the idea isn’t actually new. As James Fleming, a historian of science at Colby College, argues in his history of geoengineering, “Fixing the Sky,” one of the first attempts to engineer the planet was Project Argus in 1958. A top-secret military endeavor, Project Argus detonated atomic bombs in the upper atmosphere – about 500 kilometers (roughly 300 miles) up. The goal was to demonstrate that enemy radio and radar communications could be disrupted from half a world away, or enemy intercontinential ballistic missiles could be destroyed. In the process, the experiment also created a new radiation belt around the Earth that lasted for several years, disrupting the natural magnetosphere.

The history of these interventions and the ensuing protests serve as a cautionary tale for today’s geoengineers and, indeed, the organizations that will be tasked with regulating any future geoengineering. While some are keen to jump in with a quick and possibly profitable fix to climate change, others see a field fraught with technical, moral and political problems.

Never thought I would one day quote nasa and agree with them.. except with their climate change is a problem bullshit, CLIMATE IS CHANGE.

Even sounds like a Threatening:
Bow and sacrifice! To save CO2 and therefore the climate,
OR we will use plan B, atomic bomb geo-engineering!

And they would really love to do plan B, ever heard of mining by atomic bombs?
Way easier than to get it out slowly, one shovel at a time.




grafik.png

I made some art about it - check it out :)
Geo-Engineering will save the planet! | Ecency