You’re right that HIVE needs bigger projects to drive real demand - but there’s a catch: we can’t just wait for projects to appear. They need builders, and builders need incentive.
Splinterlands proved it’s possible, but it also showed the risk - when one big project dominates, the whole ecosystem becomes dependent on it. Diversification matters more than size.
The 8-9 cents you mentioned from previous cycles is the floor we keep testing. Each time we bounce from it, fewer people have capital left to buy. That’s the real problem - not lack of opportunity, but lack of dry powder.
About those 3 cycles back to $1 - I’ve been here for some of them too. The difference now is market structure has changed. Retail isn’t coming back the way it did before. If HIVE hits $1 again, it’ll be because of institutional adoption or ecosystem utility, not hype.
Good luck with the witness campaign. We definitely need people focused on growth.
This content got low rating by people.
Words
162
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
1y
RE: Need more big size projects onboarded on Hive to recover the price of Hive