Why should the community trust just one account to control all this? Massive amounts of money all controlled by an algorithm and won't this create artificial volume on Hive and HBD? It's not people trading Hive and HBD it is an algorithm, won't this impact the price of both or impact how investors value them?
Lastly, I have been told by you a few times that people are free to do what they want because this is an open blockchain and with that said I have chosen to not support the proposal to stabilize HBD until the tyrannical rogue downvotes by this account are stopped. You claim that you downvote content to balance out the rewards to help everyone on Hive, but couldn't you go to the trending page and downvote huge accounts that won't really care, instead you choose to consistently hit content creators with downvotes and you did it again today to post about downvotes. It contradicts a dpos blockchain when one downvote, one big account's opinion can overrule what the community has valued the post to be.
Why should I support this proposal when @smooth doesn't think content creators bring any value to Hive or as you said, without devs and investors Hive would be nothing.
RE: Supplemental funding #2 for HBD stabililzer