wayneponomo

Haha, this is awesome, and not what I was expecting when I clicked!

Hi @stray, I know there has been a lot of legal chaos lately, and frenzied attempts to rush anti-gun laws through wherever possible. Being that you're in NY state and already have strict laws (as far as

Absolutely incorrect, one needs to read the Declaration of Independence to see the only intent of the Second Amendment. How can a free people throw off a tyrannical government if they are disarmed? How

Great post, man. I've been following this pretty closely and still picked up good info from this that either hadn't seen or just overlooked.

Very thorough, thanks for the links and info :)

Thanks, one of my favorites too, I tried uploading it many times over two weeks before it finally went through :)

Youtube is now claiming they "mistakenly" deleted channels during the ongoing purge. YouTube's New Moderators Mistakenly Pull Right-Wing Channels I'm hesitant to believe that Trump is caving

Bloomberg plugged you: "Some YouTube channels recently complained about their accounts being pulled entirely. On Wednesday, the Outline highlighted accounts, including Titus Frost, that were banned

I saw on a forum earlier today where Google (and Bing) are censoring out firearms related results from the Shopping/Shop tabs on their search. I did some quick searches and posted the results here: I wonder

Excellent point about how the politicians (or lobbyists oftentimes) write the laws in an unclear way to conveniently interpret and enforce later. Heck, a lot of the time the politicians admit they don't

Yes, it doesn't get more blatant than that, does it?

The purge is definitely real, pretty much every channel I followed on youtube is banned now or has two strikes, aside from a few non political/non conspiracy type channels I like. Google practically became

Google is practically an extension of the government after the Obama admin. How can they claim they aren't violating the First Amendment by blatant censorship when Google visited the Obama White House

How can they claim they aren't violating the First Amendment when Google visited the Obama White House AT LEAST 427 times officially and there was a revolving employment door between Google and obama.gov?