RE: RE: The Guy - Is Having One Good For The Blockchain?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Guy - Is Having One Good For The Blockchain?

Words
244
Reading
2 min
Listen
Play
2y

InLeo would be best to fork away from Hive to really grow IMO and become it's own chain

Seems good. But have they (from Inleo, not from users) tried to promote their own products outside the HIVE ecosystem? (because I don't really follow their development, so I'm curious)

I am not a fan of Solana or any of the projects there. They all seem like nothing more than cash grabs and vaporware with absolutely NO real infrastructure behind it.

Some of us got interested in crypto because it started with airdrops offering free money (who here doesn't want free money). Or maybe there are users we follow on social media showing off the benefits they get from airdrops or memecoins, and some of us follow their lead (FOMO).

In SOLANA's case, it's mostly because of the memecoins. Solana which can now be considered the home of thousands of memecoins (or rather shitcoins) But in Solana there are also still some good projects such as JUPITER, RAYDIUM, MAGIC EDEN, TENSOR, and so on.

airdrops are often raised by some projects as an incentive for users. I think because of this, users are divided into 2 sides (the side that uses a project because they hope there will be an airdrop and the side that uses a project because of its usefulness). And sometimes even with the lure of airdrops, if the distribution is unfair or seems stingy, a project can be abandoned by its users.

@vrezyy: InLeo would be | Ecency