Let’s see… why is this so difficult? Because you keep dodging what @eniolw and I already explained. That’s not a real debate; you sound like a prosecutor dismissing solid evidence just to say, "They’re guilty because I say so."

Furthermore, If this were in good faith, you would have talked to us instead of defaulting to months of downvotes and accusations. Where is the benefit of the doubt? You ignore other accounts that post multiple times a day, yet you target us—even though we normally publish just once daily.

Besides, your core idea is actually good and we’ll take it into account, though it's a pity you didn't present it sooner. Our curation reports are a five-year blog tradition, and we won't drop them on a whim. Substance matters more than formalities, and "one post a day" isn't even an official platform rule.

Life in our country changes constantly, as you well know. We aim for one daily report, but if there's a delay, we still maintain an average of seven posts a week—meaning there is no abuse. Why police this so strictly while ignoring powerful users doing the exact same thing?

We cannot commit to your rigid demands because circumstances change overnight, and we won’t give up our right to use our blog legitimately. That aside, thanks for the suggestion; we'll consider it alongside our ongoing original content, like our conversation club reports and shorts.