Sure, @chessbrotherspro is at the top with 13.16% over the last 7 days. But if you actually look at the rest of that chart, it's pretty clear you're just cherry-picking.

That same screenshot shows a massive 86.84% of our voting power went straight to the community.

Check the pie chart again. It's super spread out, showing we're backing dozens of independent authors. If a project were just trying to "milk" rewards or whatever you're hinting at, it wouldn't be giving away nearly 90% of its stake to other creators.

We've been doing this for over 6 years now. Allocating a tiny slice of VP to keep the lights on is pretty standard stuff on Hive. It's even less of a big deal for small projects like ours where nobody is getting rich off a 13% self-vote anyway. You're kind of missing the big picture here.

You're also overlooking that using a fraction of our VP for maintenance while channeling almost all of it into the chess community isn't abuse. It's just how you keep a project running long-term.

Honestly, far from proving any "farming", your screenshot basically just proves we're active and community-first. Appreciate you posting the receipts for us!

@stayputoftherz