Seven years. Somehow surprised the chain is still active.

Yes, and Hannah explained all of that.

No need to read this 💩 . Listen to the teardown from the 🦡.

No, it's not.

That's not true. They will know the pain.

“Explaining Men's Rights is like explaining a snow storm one snow flake at a time” — Cassie Jaye In America, for example, Democrats passed a law last September Indeed. That's one of the things MRAs have

The biggest difference between us is that I believe all humans should be bound by the same rules and reason, you seem to think there should be different rules and reasons based on gender. You are wrong

… You're regurgitating a twisted version of the facts and spreading it as propaganda … Your center point is wrong, and based on a lie. You believe the lie because it supports what you want to believe.

If telling the truth is hate then so be it. because it was assumed that male sexual needs were so uncontrollable FALSELY assumed. Most men are able to control there sexual needs and majority of those who

If you can't sum up the full argument for me in less than 1000 words Just read the first 1000 words here: Janice is an english literature professor — her eloquence is beyond anything I could ever hope

I'm not the one who hates. I'm pointing out the hate from the other side. Unless you follow that new definition from the United Nations where truth is now hate speech. They did that a few years ago. This

Pointing out a general occurrence and then giving an example it not the same as giving an example and then construction a generality from that single example. Main difference: my point would still be valid

Criminals exist — I never said they don't. Slaves also existed — but slavery was neither gendered nor was it restricted to certain races. Remember the word itself comes from slavic. Speaking of what happens

and that hatred most often exists for very good reasons. And feminism would be the exception to that rule. Feminist hatred was and still is based on lies and falsehoods. legal for husbands to kill their

There is a difference between hating a single person and hating a group. Also my actual argument is the video which you have not yet addressed. You are arguing the teaser and the teaser doesn't need to

You should watch the videos first. There is absolutely no point debunking a teaser to video because you don't know the full extend of the actual argument made. Also: a single counter example does not disprove

If the founders of a movement where full of hate then yes, the whole movement ist based on hate. Also that's the fallacy fallacy. Just because you pointed out a potential fallacy in my argumentation doesn't

Men, as a group, never hated women. That's a feminst lie. And it's easy to prove: If men hated women feminism would not exist.

Watch the video for examples of feminists who clearly hated men about 150 years ago.

How is that supposed to work?